Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan from Michigan
foreigners in the US do not have gun ownership rights. what the hell is this suspect doing with the piece? All we need now is for him to be from a certain region of the world that is on all of our minds these days.....
54 posted on 01/16/2002 10:56:28 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: AmericanInTokyo
I wonder how he got it too.
65 posted on 01/16/2002 10:58:40 AM PST by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanInTokyo
foreigners in the US do not have gun ownership rights.

On what do you base this??? What other rights do foreigners not have? Does the Constitution not apply to them at all?

111 posted on 01/16/2002 11:05:31 AM PST by TexRef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanInTokyo
There is no reason why a foreigner on a visa is prohibited from owning a firearm. When that Jordanian idiot opened fire in the Empire State Building, also with a .380, the feds enacted a rule that you have be a resident of your state for three months prior to purchasing a firearm. This only applies if you are an alien.
151 posted on 01/16/2002 11:19:25 AM PST by sig226
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanInTokyo
foreigners in the US do not have gun ownership rights. what the hell is this suspect doing with the piece?

Sure they do, as much as anyone else anyway. As long as they are legal residents that is. The second amendment protects "the right of the people", the Supreme Court has ruled that "the people" as used in the bill of rights, includes more than citizens.

While this textual exegesis is by no means conclusive, it suggests that "the people" protected by the Fourth Amendment, and by the First and Second Amendments, and to whom rights and powers are reserved in the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, refers to a class of persons who are part of a national community or who have otherwise developed sufficient connection with this country to be considered part of that community. UNITED STATES v. VERDUGO-URQUIDEZ

318 posted on 01/16/2002 1:13:48 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson