Posted on 01/23/2002 3:02:40 PM PST by jennyp
But this year's bill, above, is a bit different. He's trying to argue that since both the US Declaration of Independence and the WA State Constitution mention individual rights as coming from a Creator, then any high school science textbook that doesn't teach creationism should be illegal! AFAIK, this is a new tactic on the creationist legal front.
This is the kind of argument that's sure to get lots of traction in, ah, certain circles here on FR. Unfortunately the argument is just plain wrong.
Sure, we've been endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights. It's just that our creator was a natural process, not some supernatural person. The critical part of that claim is that we are endowed with rights. This means that rights are necessary for our survival, because of what we are: Human beings.
Humans - because of our human nature as rational thinking beings with few other advantages against the beasts of the wild - requires civilization to survive & thrive. An advancing & robust civilization requires individual freedom. No successful modern civilization has been based (or could be) on slavery or dictatorship.
The Founders, being children of the Enlightenment, knew this 200 years ago. But since they were all theists (to varying degrees), of course they said we were endowed "by our Creator".
Fixating on the phrase "our Creator" and concluding that rights can only be a gift from a supernatural person, instead of the phrase's clear meaning that our rights are simply inherent in our nature as human beings, is a mistake. IMO it's exactly the same mistake that gun grabbers make when they fixate on the phrase "A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State" and conclude that the 2nd Amendment only means that states can have a National Guard.
This guy is making a mockery of my faith.
Hey, if I were a God who had already lived an infinite length of time, all alone, I'd want to stretch out the evolution of the universe for as long as I could too, if only out of sheer boredom. :-)
Are we permitted to talk dirty like that on FR?
And what do you mean: "Just for a minute...."?
Back to the topic, I'm just waiting for a legislator to get the bright idea of repealing the Law of Gravity, so it will be easier to walk up stairs with a bag of groceries. That would make as much sense as this guy's Bill.
Another theory: God was bored.
So He created the Universe.
But He was still bored, so He created plant life.
And, finding that He was still bored, He created animals.
No luck on dealing with the boredom, so He created man.
And He hasn't stopped laughing ever since!
I reserve that activity for The Fetching Mrs. Poohbah alone :o)
Nature? Good point. Jefferson is on the same track:
WHEN in the Course of human Events, it becomes necessary for one People to dissolve the Political Bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the Powers of the Earth, the separate and equal Station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the Separation.
The problem with these fantasists like this politician, they assume the word "creator" in the Declaration of Independence means what they think is the "creator." Blind projection.
And they bristle when we note that so many of them don't understand how science works at all.
Do you make the same demand with regard to the teaching of electromagnetism, or the atomic theory of chemistry?
I completely agree, this is really ridiculous.
Washington state Bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.