[notease]

"...Nor is it a place where anti establishment
rhetoric should be spread."

Does my esteemed colleague intend to promote
pro-establishment rhetoric? If that be the case,
allow me the courtesy of one minor difference with
the gentleman. The establishment can, I think we
can surely agree, take care of itself.

Could you give an example or two of anti-establishment
rhetoric which you think exceeded reasonable bounds.

[Cold Heat]

I see I have touched a hot button! Ok, How about the 100 of more threads explaining the Bush conpiracy involving Osama B. How about the 100 or more threads about x-42 and the Carlisle (sp) group with inferences of funding terrorism and Saudi connections to oil and gas price manipulation and who the heck knows what. Dozens and dozens of anti Bush threads about his purported love of illegal aliens from Mexico.

I've just started, would you like me to go on.

[Cold Heat]

My point is that it's going to be hard, going into election season, to make a good solid run at taking back the Senate, keeping the House, and getting governorships when stuff like that is being spread like cow dung.

Yea! it's a free country and all, but this is a political consevative forum that supports its conservative candidates. Or do we really?