[El Sordo]

Whoa now!!

Many of the author's "points" about Libertarian thought depend entirely on how he chooses to define his terms. His apparent definition of "coercion" being chief among them.

I find that the aurhtor is flagrantly using logical fallacies and selectively defining his terms in order to make a specious argument.

[Exnihilo]

I find that the aurhtor is flagrantly using logical fallacies and selectively defining his terms in order to make a specious argument

Funny, I and the author both find that Libertarians consistantly do that.. hmm...

[steve-b]

Many of the author's "points" about Libertarian thought depend entirely on how he chooses to define his terms.

And I would have sworn that Billzebubba had far too much ego to write under a nom de plume....