[Exnihilo]

I find it interesting that you refuse to address any of the author's points, but instead point out what "side" he is on, as if that automatically invalidates his points. That's what I call a short-cut to thinking.

[FreedomIsSimple]

I find it interesting that you refuse to address any of the author's points, but instead point out what "side" he is on, as if that automatically invalidates his points. That's what I call a short-cut to thinking.

The author's "points" are based on socialism, based on the idea that it is just fine for the government to redistribute income and regulate employer-employee relationships to an absurd degree. Therefore, your precious "points" mean nothing to Libertarians and I would dare say, most conservatives.