Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex
The moment we accept that the government should exist to protect individual rights, we have accepted in principle the entire lumbering apparatus of modern government: taxes, regulations, foreign wars, you name it, as part of an amorphous "social contract".

I'm a minarchist and I don't believe in any kind of social contract.

54 posted on 02/15/2002 7:44:37 PM PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: A.J.Armitage; who_would_fardels_bear; Okiegolddust
I don't believe in any kind of social contract.

Of course you do. If you believe in government with consent of the governed then that is a social contract that you believe in. Then, as Who_would_fardels_bear correctly observes in #56,

If huge sections of the citizenry behave irresponsibly, then they can either choose to vote themselves into a socialist state or they can impoverish themselves so that they beg for a savior to help them out of their mess.

In other words, while freedom is necessary condition of virtue, it is not a sufficient condition. A free nation that loses its virtue will freely enslave itself.

58 posted on 02/28/2002 7:28:03 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: A.J.Armitage
I don't believe in any kind of social contract.

That's a bold statement, A.J. What's the difference between minarchy and anarchy?

74 posted on 03/06/2002 12:57:00 PM PST by Pistias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson