Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former astronaut Aldrin, Purdue engineers planning Mars hotels
Purdue News ^ | February 5, 2002 | Emil Venere,

Posted on 02/05/2002 3:41:09 PM PST by aculeus

WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. – Buzz Aldrin, the second man to walk on the moon, is leading a team of researchers, including engineers at Purdue University, to design a new class of spacecraft that would serve as orbiting hotels perpetually cruising between Earth and Mars.

The "cycler" spacecraft would constantly ferry people and materials between the two planets, enabling earthlings to explore, commercially develop and eventually colonize the Red Planet.

"We believe these regular planetary flybys would create an entirely new economic and philosophic approach to space exploration," the researchers wrote in a December report prepared for NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. "Reliable, reusable and dependable cycler transportation can be the key to carry humanity into the next great age of exploration, expansion, settlement and multi-planetary commerce."

Aldrin is working with a team of researchers, including professors and engineering graduate students at Purdue, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the University of Texas. The former astronaut is an engineer by training and holds a doctorate from MIT.

"We are going to put in a proposal for a more detailed study to narrow down some of the choices of the different kinds of cyclers and decide which ones seem to fit into a very nice operational mission," Aldrin said.

Modified versions of the space shuttle's external fuel tank might be used as building units for cyclers. The tank ordinarily is jettisoned during shuttle flights, and it burns up in the atmosphere. However, the shuttle's external fuel tank could be modified, adding two additional empty tanks atop the existing fuel tank. Instead of being jettisoned, the modified external tank assembly could then be carried by the shuttle all the way to low-earth orbit, where the dry tanks could be separated from the main tank and used to construct the spacecraft.

Cyclers would take advantage of the gravitational forces that are exerted by the sun, the planets and their moons, which provide "gravity assists" to passing spacecraft. As a spacecraft travels close to a planet, its flight path is bent, causing it to whip around the planet while boosting its speed. The path is commonly called a "slingshot" trajectory, which enables a spacecraft to achieve the proper speed and heading.

"The cycler essentially is in orbit around the sun and makes regular flybys of Earth and Mars," said team member James Longuski, a professor of aeronautics and astronautics at Purdue. "Once you put your vehicle into a cycler orbit, it continues on its own momentum, going back and forth between Earth and Mars. You may need to carry some propellant for an occasional boost, but it's pretty much a free trip after that."

In their report to JPL, researchers said a cycler would practically fly itself and "become a permanent, man-made inner solar system companion of Earth and Mars, tapping the free and inexhaustible 'fuel supply' of gravitational forces to maintain orbit. Like an ocean liner on a regular trade route, a cycler will glide perpetually along its beautifully predictable orbit."

However, it is difficult to precisely design cycler trajectories because of the complex orbital relationship between Earth and Mars as the planets travel around the sun. While the Earth orbits the sun in a nearly circular route, Mars' orbit is oblong, or elliptical. That means the distance between Mars and the Earth varies dramatically depending on Mars' orbital position around the sun, complicating the design of spacecraft trajectories between the two planets.

"If they were both in circular orbits, any cycler that you would design would repeat perfectly over and over again," Longuski said. "Mars' orbit is somewhat eccentric. That throws a curve ball into the whole design."

Determining the precise path for cyclers requires engineers highly skilled in celestial mechanics who use mathematical techniques to create and evaluate numerous possible trajectories, eventually arriving at the best choice. Longuski and his students have previously designed trajectories for an unmanned spacecraft to Jupiter's moon Europa, which is tentatively scheduled for launch in 2006. The team also designed trajectories for a hypothetical manned mission to Mars.

"Some day, people will be going to Mars on a regular basis," Longuski said. "Most people are convinced that we are going to do this; the only question is when."

The cycler spacecraft would have to encounter Mars and Earth at precisely the right distance and speed. If a cycler approached Mars too fast or at the wrong distance, too much fuel would be needed for steering rockets and it would be more difficult for "taxi" spacecraft to dock with the cyclers as they sped by.

A cycler might fly past the Earth at about 21,000 kilometers per hour, or roughly 13,000 miles per hour. Small taxi spacecraft carrying people and supplies would have to rendezvous with the speeding cycler.

"This is sort of like a bus that doesn't stop," Longuski said. "When it comes by, you have to run alongside of it and grab on. "

The outbound trip to Mars would take six to eight months.

"Then, when you get to Mars, you get in the taxi and de-orbit down to the planet," said Longuski, who is working with Purdue graduate students to design "outbound" and "inbound" trajectories, or the trips from Earth to Mars and from Mars to Earth.

"These cyclers would be like space hotels," Longuski said. "They would provide the usual creature comforts."

Cyclers would rotate slowly to create artificial gravity and prevent the debilitating effects of weightlessness on its passengers. The spacecraft also would be roomy enough to make the trip tolerable. The earliest versions of the space hotels might accommodate up to 50 passengers.

One cycler would not be sufficient: By the time that craft arrived at Mars, the two planets would have moved much farther apart, making a return trip impractically long. Rather, a family of perhaps three cyclers, continuously providing outbound and inbound flights, would ensure that passengers could get to Earth and Mars within a reasonable amount of time, Longuski said.

While the Purdue engineers are working on the interplanetary celestial mechanics of getting back and forth between Earth and Mars, researchers at the University of Texas and MIT are helping with other critical aspects of the trip, such as getting a cycler into the proper position to begin its trip to Mars and learning how to design the taxis.

"We have to look at the configuration of those taxis and how much energy will be needed to intercept the cyclers," Aldrin said.

Perhaps the first cyclers could fly around 2018, he said.

"The first mission will be more conservative, and it will have more safety supports until we are sure we know what we are doing," Aldrin said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Visa accepted?
1 posted on 02/05/2002 3:41:09 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Declare Mars a Federal Protected Area.

Mars in the Balance

2 posted on 02/05/2002 3:46:01 PM PST by BOBTHENAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
A cycler between the Earth and Moon for tourism would work because that would be less than two weeks in duration.
I don't see how there could be any kind of market for a Mars cycler, this would be a two year "vacation".
If you wanted to colonize Mars then this would be the way to go.
The Moon is THE vacation destination until we get inertial fusion propulsion or space-drives.
3 posted on 02/05/2002 3:57:30 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
I was just thinking of declaring it a permanently tax-free zone.

Property values are going up!

4 posted on 02/05/2002 3:58:14 PM PST by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
You really don't win much by this technique. The cycler is going really fast when it comes by earth or mars. Passengers from earth have to be accellerated to the same speed normally needed to get them to mars. They just go on a different ship. The earth shuttle then has to decellerate in order to prevent it's going to mars too.

Aldrin should know better. A little like hopping on a passenger train at the station without the train slowing down.

5 posted on 02/05/2002 4:05:53 PM PST by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

6 posted on 02/05/2002 4:06:07 PM PST by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
Maybe if we buy early when the Feds take it we can get confiscatory recompense.
7 posted on 02/05/2002 4:07:32 PM PST by BOBTHENAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Beat me to it!
8 posted on 02/05/2002 4:08:55 PM PST by steve in DC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I like this idea. A side excursion to Mars' surface is not necessary, I'll just take the slow boat cruise out and back.
9 posted on 02/05/2002 4:12:26 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Exactly. We should be proving and refining the cycler and related technologies with the moon before going on to Mars. Regular trips to Mars will require a lot of infrastructure. Launching from either the moon or lunar orbit would have a lot of advantages and would make an ideal staging point for larger ambitions.
10 posted on 02/05/2002 4:13:25 PM PST by Orangedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Huck
What?

Sorry, just had a flashback.

11 posted on 02/05/2002 4:14:48 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Some day, people will be going to Mars on a regular basis

That sounds like a boring vacation even by my standards. Better bring the Scrabble.
12 posted on 02/05/2002 4:27:26 PM PST by meowmeow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
"We believe these regular planetary flybys would create an entirely new economic and philosophic approach to space exploration," the researchers wrote in a December report prepared for NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

And the taxpayers are footing the bill for this? Good grief.

13 posted on 02/05/2002 4:33:32 PM PST by Log
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
You really don't win much by this technique...

Actually, you only have to accelerate a bus full of people to catch up to the cycler. The velocity is probably only a hair over earth escape. De-acceleration may include aerodynamic braking. With a dedicated spacecraft, you must accelerate and de-accelerate the habitat.

Supply may be via unmanned craft, using a variety of boost methods incompatible with sending people (low-accel, high-boost, solar sail, etc), and it may be fairly continuous.

The cycler can actually grow over time to be a fairly impressive space habitat. If it acquires enough mass it could act as a momentum bank and utilize a tether to transfer passengers and cargo.

Even with the advent of high-isp nuclear rockets the cycler is still a cool approach, although orion-style spacecraft could beat it.

As far as a cycler being a solution goes, there isn't a problem yet. Oh well. But I would like to get off the planet.

14 posted on 02/05/2002 5:13:59 PM PST by no-s
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Log
Well, now; the Shuttle Tanks are now "Taxpayer-Funded Throwaways!"

The "Tanks" are also great, "High-Volume Building Blocks (potentially)," for "atmosphere containing Habitats," which would require relatively inexpensive "in-Orbit Modification" to sustain a few dozen "spacefareing souls" for an extended period!

Why NOT use this "readily available Resource" to "realize" a DREAM held by a LARGE percent of Humankind?

Destroying the SCUM who would eradicate the Dreams of our Race is our Duty--Creating, Fostering, & Enabling the Destiny of our Species is ALSO our "DUTY," ---& OUR DESTINY!

WE must take our Species Back to the Moon & on to Mars--& on to the STARS!

We have demonstrated our "Capabilities,"--WE now "Bear the Standard," & WE are now OBLIGED to take our Species to the Planets & on to the STARS!!

"So it is Written---SO WILL IT BE!!"

The "Blindered Bean-Counters" who judge all by the relative value of their "Stock Portfolio" are NOT TO BE TRUSTED to "Hold Humankind's Destiny" in their carefully enumerated "Hands."

The "DREAMERS" hold our Species' Destiny----the "Shuttle Tanks" are our "Ticket" to the Moon, Mars, & BEYOND!!----SCREW the accountants!!

The Moon & the Planets are "within our grasp,"--let's SEIZE the MOMENT!!!

Doc

15 posted on 02/05/2002 5:56:53 PM PST by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: no-s
Actually, you only have to accelerate a bus full of people to catch up to the cycler. The velocity is probably only a hair over earth escape.

Same speed as required to get to Mars; 25,000 mph plus (unless you'd like to get to Mars in much less than a year).

Aerodynamic braking doesn't help much when your going 25K the wrong way.

Now it takes a 3 million pound vehicle to get 7 people to 18,000mph. I don't see that changing much for atleast another 20 years.

(MIT67 aero/astro, NASA67-94 retired)

16 posted on 02/05/2002 9:53:48 PM PST by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Aero braking is for cycler->planet trips. 25000mph isn't unreasonable (Say, Apollo capsule at re-entry). Twenty years to do better than shuttle is unreasonable, considering you have to go back in time to beat it (bring back the Saturn).

(I used to hang out with Max Hunter, nyah)

17 posted on 02/06/2002 6:39:08 AM PST by no-s
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: no-s
25k is not unreasonable, but your headed the wrong way. Also 25k is not a fast Mars trip as suggested. Didn't know Max, but did meet VB. I loved the Sat V, a real rocket.
18 posted on 02/06/2002 12:59:29 PM PST by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: no-s
If you really want a space fuel, check out the radioactive element americium 242m. Do a google search for the info. It's about 100 times as powerful as plutonium.
19 posted on 02/06/2002 1:16:13 PM PST by techcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Are you from the boiler land?
20 posted on 02/06/2002 1:18:14 PM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson