Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JimRobinson
After this comment, can John Ashcroft be exempt from the "no smearing" rule?
6 posted on 02/06/2002 5:16:44 AM PST by francisandbeans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: francisandbeans
After this comment, can John Ashcroft be exempt from the "no smearing" rule?

If it's the truth, or can be reasonably advanced as the truth based on the evidence, it's not a smear. For instance, stating that Clinton is corrupt, a habitual liar, a sexual predator, etc. is not a smear -- there are plenty of clear indications for all of the above.

18 posted on 02/06/2002 5:37:17 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: francisandbeans; Jim Robinson
After this comment, can John Ashcroft be exempt from the "no smearing" rule?

I think that no public official should be exempt from smearing, including Ol' Beaver-Face Ashcroft. His opinion of opponents of the USSA-Patriot-in-Name-Only act probably makes Janet Reno hot.

137 posted on 02/06/2002 7:07:14 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson