[calvin sun]

I think I understand the factual point you are making: namely, that the editor has apologized, and that ?we should leave things alone? Actually, do I understand correctly in this regard?

I am, however, at a loss to understand the seemingly snide and gratuitous personal attacks on the others who replying to you. Why, for example, must someone necessarily be LYING when talking about the editor? Thanks.

[LarryLied]

Can't slap down these creeps hard enough. The editor allowed an exploitation of 911 to try to scare the elderly into believing they are going to lose their social security checks because of the Bush Budget. That is as despicable as it gets.

There is no apology possible for such an action.

[VA Advogado]

I think I understand the factual point you are making: namely, that the editor has apologized, and that ?we should leave things alone? Actually, do I understand correctly in this regard?

Yes, thats is a point I am trying to make.

[VA Advogado]

I am, however, at a loss to understand the seemingly snide and gratuitous personal attacks on the others who replying to you. Why, for example, must someone necessarily be LYING when talking about the editor? Thanks.

Because that other cheeseball was trying to link the editor's comment about the picture being copyrighted to all sorts of sinister intentions and hidden motives. She's just nuts.