Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Skooz
Isn't the last sentence quite chilling? Is this the last stand for private property? Is this incremental socialism?

Not really. You are just conditioned by the building trades who focus only on penny wise pound foolish. If everyone does it by incorporating it in the pre-planning stage, the additional costs are very minimal. In many cases, it will actually be cheaper.

Look on the bright side. It will be easier to move belongings and furniture into the house, you can get an oversized refrigerator and giant beer kegs, and in the bathroom you can more readily install heavy duty exercise machines or fancy Swedish sex apparatus. Not a bad deal at all.

14 posted on 02/10/2002 7:29:05 AM PST by DonkeyHodee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DonkeyHodee
or fancy Swedish sex apparatus. Not a bad deal at all.

Any chance the above could become law, "Honest Hun, it's in the building code!"

15 posted on 02/10/2002 8:01:02 AM PST by nofriendofbills
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: DonkeyHodee
Not really. You are just conditioned by the building trades who focus only on penny wise pound foolish. If everyone does it by incorporating it in the pre-planning stage, the additional costs are very minimal. In many cases, it will actually be cheaper.

Yes, but now that these rules been codified, it's just a short step to requiring you to make changes for "reasonable accomodations" to your existing house before you can sell it.

I mean, after all, if you are selling a house that cannot be immediately occupied by a handi...oops! disabled person then you are effectively practicing descrimination.</sarcasm>

16 posted on 02/10/2002 8:19:56 AM PST by frossca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson