Exactly what I said. In fact, it is bizarre in the extreme to let off the ringleader and prosecute her hired guns instead.
No you said : "murderers were never punished for their crimes."
You classified the women getting the abortion as "accomplices," not murderers. The abortionist is the murderer in this case. And they certainly were punished in the past.
However Mr. Lallier, whom you cited, was concerned exclusively that abortion cannot be illegal because it would inevitably lead to endless legal entanglements of women as accomplices in abortions. Despite the fact that you may think it unjust, since women were never prosecuted as abortion accomplices when abortion was illegal, Mr. Lallier's contention is refuted by the facts.
You now seem to be raising a new objection to illegal abortion: If all guilty parties cannot be punished, no guilty party may be punished. In other words, if you cannot punish both the abortionist and the woman who procures his services, you ought to let both off scot free. Have I accurately stated your position?