Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tortoise
"Clearly we can repeat ad nausium the intelligent creation of useful human programs, but the scientific jury is still "out" on whether useful programs can self-form without intelligent intervention." - Southack

"The jury is not "out" and this is trivially demonstrable. ALL programs of finite length can be produced in a finite amount of time by stupid automata."

"Automata" are intelligently designed programs, not self-formed naturally. Sure, an intelligent designer can build a computer program to write other programs via various methodologies, but that's not "natural" and unaided, rather - that's directed.

51 posted on 02/28/2002 10:22:20 PM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Southack
"Automata" are intelligently designed programs, not self-formed naturally. Sure, an intelligent designer can build a computer program to write other programs via various methodologies, but that's not "natural" and unaided, rather - that's directed.

Automata is irrelevant, though my example was still valid. Replace "automata" with "random noise source" and it is just as true.

53 posted on 02/28/2002 10:24:12 PM PST by tortoise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson