Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

COP SHOOTS ‘ROLE PLAY’ SOLDIERS IN LETHAL ERROR
New York Post ^ | 2/25/02 | Post Wire Services

Posted on 02/25/2002 12:52:18 AM PST by kattracks

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:04:16 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-236 next last
To: CharlieDarwin
Perhaps so they can deal with enemies in other countries?

Posing as civilians, disarming an enemy population one by one would be a slow, tedious and dangerous task. I don't like to think of our military as the gun control of the world. If we wish to disarm a population then we should do it as a military operation, fully identified as such and with overwhelming force.

21 posted on 02/25/2002 3:32:49 AM PST by Flyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rifleman
Tough cop though, if two spec ops guys can't take him at a traffic stop.

Agreed, although the soldiers did think they were just "playing".

22 posted on 02/25/2002 3:34:48 AM PST by Flyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Before someone's tin hat starts getting the creases ironed out, let me explain this training exercise.

Robin Sage (previously known as Gobbler's Woods) is the "graduation" exercise for Special Forces candidates.  It is an unconventional warfare (UW) scenario with soldiers playing the part of guerrillas and local civilians as auxiliary support. The exercise has been held in the south-central part of North Carolina for around 40 years.  Many of the civilian participants from senior citizens to children have participated in these exercises.  I used children to recon targets at one time and once had an old geezer use his black-powder cannon in support of an ambush.  When I was a kid I acted as a courier for messages between guerrilla groups and assisted in the hiding of downed pilots.

Before every exercise land use is coordinated with local landowners.  Local government agencies are notified that the exercise will be held in their area.  Sounds to me like someone screwed up and didn't notify the Moore County Sheriff's office.   Normally, all law enforcement agencies are notified to be on the lookout for the guerrillas in order for the exercise controllers to direct conventional "aggressor" units to conduct anti-guerrilla operations.

Someone's head should roll.  This is an exciting and realistic (this time too much so!) exercise but must be coordinated properly.  I believe because of the rotation of experienced personnel into deploying/deployed units and their replacement in the training unit with National Guard and IMA personnel, someone forgot one important support coordination that will impact severely on future training of some of the best troops in the world.

23 posted on 02/25/2002 3:58:03 AM PST by Dark Watch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waxhaw
It seems to me Butler was acting entirely correct - especially post-9/11. He pulls over two strangers; one apparently tries to disarm him while another apparently tries to retrieve an M-4...

True.

(isn't that the snazzy cut-down M-16?).

Sure as shootin'!

Were I Butler I would definitely be shooting first and asking questions later. While I am not happy a U.S. soldier has died this fault lies more with this soldier's officers than it does with Butler; Butler acted correctly.

Probably. But if you recall from your military days, no one but no one takes a weapon from a U.S. soldier.

24 posted on 02/25/2002 4:02:07 AM PST by Restore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Cops said Butler was "totally unaware" of the exercise.

I wonder if he is also "totally unaware" of the sun that shines on his head? What do you suppose he thought the source of all the explosions and machinegun fire that had been going on in his county for almost two weeks was?

25 posted on 02/25/2002 4:05:56 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
I dont know why they feel the need to run these scenerios on civilians anyway

Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean there aren't very good reasons for it.I know you have read those reasons right here on FR,and choose to not accept them. What you DO need to accept is that there are people who know more about what the army needs than you do.

26 posted on 02/25/2002 4:08:40 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flyer
One of the reasons we're claiming the "detainees" in Afghanistan are not POW's is, contrary to the Geneva Convention, they wear no uniquely identifiable uniform. As such, they are mere insurgents and the GC does not apply. Is the Army explaining this to its soldiers?
27 posted on 02/25/2002 4:08:52 AM PST by SteamshipTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Flyer
Hmmm. . . why are there practicing disarming?

Hmmmm....because it's a part of their job skills?

28 posted on 02/25/2002 4:09:53 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
Check this out. Ugly, and not unforeseeable, given the increased rate of MOUT training off-post.

HorseHillary! "Increased rate" my ass. These are regullary scheduled training operations that are occuring at the same frequency they have been occuring for years.

29 posted on 02/25/2002 4:12:56 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
My BIL served with these guys. They were in SF training together. I live in Moore County and the deputies here are all well known and likeable and not the kind to "abuse" their authority. I personally know this deputy as well.There HAS to be more to this than what is being told.
30 posted on 02/25/2002 4:14:16 AM PST by PleaseNoMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waxhaw
Are the deputies supposedly sympathetic to their local communities

No,in these scenarios the deputies are working for the foreign forces that have invaded the country,and against the local population.

and therefore must be disarmed by the federal troops?

They are NOT "federal troops". They are working as a SF team that has infiltrated a occupied area to work with and train the indigident people of the area in guerilla warfare so they can overthrow the occupying foreign forces that have taken over their country. EXACTLY like what the teams did in Afhiganistan.

Lots of questions here.

Only for people whose tinfoil hats are on too tight.

31 posted on 02/25/2002 4:17:29 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
DarkWatch's post had the same message, but was several orders of magnitude more enlightening.

And the perception here, is that there are increased MOUT training exercises happening in various cities. Perhaps this one in particular has been happening for a long time, but some of the training ops in our cities seem new to this observer.

32 posted on 02/25/2002 4:20:31 AM PST by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: meenie
Isn't there a Posse Comitatus Act that addresses this?

No.

Why does our government fail to abide by their own laws?

Which laws are you talking about?

The person or persons responsible for these soldiers and their illegal training exercises should be in the iron bar hotel for an extended period of time.

There is and was nothing illegal about this exercise. SF alone has been running training operations in that area for over 40 years now,and the 82nd Abn Div was running training operations there before WW-2.

33 posted on 02/25/2002 4:20:44 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
Maneuvers here are something that is the norm. It is nothing to see men from MacKall in the woods near my home or to look up and see them parachuting into the field surrounding my home. The ammunitions training that literally shakes you out of your seat because it is so close is something that we have grown accustomed to. I live les than two miles from Camp MacKall so it is something that we are used to experiencing. I guess you could say that this deputy thought no more of the machine gun fire and explosions in the county recently than he had in the past. There should have been better information passed within the dept.
34 posted on 02/25/2002 4:20:57 AM PST by PleaseNoMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: calvin sun
Reading your post gave me chills, could it be?
35 posted on 02/25/2002 4:21:12 AM PST by dixie sass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: calvin sun
Don't let reality intrude into your favorite fantasy. ESPECIALLY one that comes from a movie.
36 posted on 02/25/2002 4:21:54 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
Hmmmm....because it's a part of their job skills?

I understand and accept the need for this type of training. I just have to check my tin foil hat once a week to be sure it is in top operating condition.

That said, there were obviously some blunders made in the preparation of this exercise.

37 posted on 02/25/2002 4:23:50 AM PST by Flyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Something very, very bogus here.
38 posted on 02/25/2002 4:26:38 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packrat01
Sign of the times.

In what way? We don't know what set the stage for this yet. I have my own suspiscions,but will remain silent about them for the time being.

It's a wonder it hasn't happened sooner.

No,it's a wonder it happened now. I was working those training operations myself until about 2 years ago,and there is no way in hell that deputy didn't know the SF students were running training operations in that area. He may not have known that two of the three people in the truck he stopped were SF students on a recon operation,but the only way he could have been ignorant of their operations would be if he normally worked the southern part of Moore County (Pinehurst),and had been transfered to the northern part that very day to patrol. If that is the case,it is the fault of the sheriffs dept for not notifying him.

39 posted on 02/25/2002 4:27:58 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dark Watch
Although this may have been something done yearly, with the element of fear prevalent in the country, it would seem very prudent for the Commanding Officer and the local authorities to make very sure that all personnel were forewarned in writing well in advance of the activities. There is a good posibility that this incident would never have happened.
40 posted on 02/25/2002 4:28:32 AM PST by dixie sass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-236 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson