Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge orders release of Cheney task force records, criticizes Energy Department
Associated Press / SFGate

Posted on 02/27/2002 2:08:26 PM PST by RCW2001

Judge orders release of Cheney task force records, criticizes Energy Department
PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer
Wednesday, February 27, 2002
©2002 Associated Press

URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2002/02/27/national1804EST0818.DTL

(02-27) 15:04 PST WASHINGTON (AP) --

A federal judge on Wednesday ordered the Energy Department to release thousands of records on Vice President Dick Cheney's energy task force, criticizing the government for moving at "a glacial pace."

The ruling by U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler could undermine the Bush administration's effort to keep secret the names of industry executives and lobbyists who met with the White House as it formulated its energy plan last spring.

The General Accounting Office and a conservative group, Judicial Watch, have filed separate lawsuits trying to force the White House to turn over the material.

Starting March 25, the Energy Department must turn over its documents to the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group. It must complete the task by April 10.

The department had asked to release the material in stages, beginning March 15 and ending May 15. The environmental group first asked for the documents last April 26 and sued the government in December.

The Energy Department and other federal agencies are subject to the Freedom of Information Act, while the White House is not.

"I don't know that it's possible for certain to tell what the documents will reveal, but obviously the DOE stonewalled us for almost a year and they presumably had a reason to do that," said Rob Perks, a spokesman for the environmental group.

The government says 7,500 pages on Cheney's task force are responsive to the NRDC's request. The department will continue to withhold many documents and will issue a list of them along with the legal reasons they are being kept secret.

"There can be little question that the Department of Energy has been woefully tardy" in processing the nonprofit group's request, wrote Kessler.

"After making a virtually meaningless release of some form letters back in May of 2001, the department has done little of substance -- apart from collecting and organizing responsive documents," the judge added. "What is even more distressing is that" there were at least 11 other requests for the same documents.

The government has no legal justification "for working at a glacial pace."

NRDC attorney Sharon Buccino praised the ruling, saying "the court has protected the public's fundamental right to know what its government is doing."

In a statement, the environmental group expressed confidence that with the court victory in hand, the NRDC "expects to make public -- for the first time since the task force was formed more than a year ago -- the names of participants, dates of meetings, and the topics discussed.

"That information will expose which energy companies or industry lobbyists influenced the work DOE staff did on the Bush-Cheney energy plan," said the environmental group's statement.

©2002 Associated Press  


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last

1 posted on 02/27/2002 2:08:26 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Same judge as the Mary Frances Berry nonsense, I think.
2 posted on 02/27/2002 2:12:38 PM PST by Queen of Excelsior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: seamole
Doesn't the Bush administration plan to appeal this ruling?
4 posted on 02/27/2002 2:16:29 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
DC Judges are all Liberals....this will be appealled all the way to Supreme court
5 posted on 02/27/2002 2:17:23 PM PST by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: RCW2001
I did NOT place this in 'breaking news'....I swear to God I didn't...
7 posted on 02/27/2002 2:18:50 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
If it's true that the White House are really protecting the notes they have as confidential information then that still stands as their motive since it is not the W.H. acquiescing.
8 posted on 02/27/2002 2:20:34 PM PST by big bad easter bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
They won't do this. They will appeal. The principle is this: should the president of the United States be entitled to receive confidential advice? The answer is a resounding yes.

The Supreme Court will go a minimum of 5-4 for the President.

9 posted on 02/27/2002 2:21:30 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
The government has no legal justification "for working at a glacial pace."

Hell, they always work at a glacial pace!

10 posted on 02/27/2002 2:21:46 PM PST by pray4liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
well actually it is breaking news!
11 posted on 02/27/2002 2:23:05 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
"I don't know that it's possible for certain to tell what the documents will reveal, but obviously the DOE stonewalled us for almost a year and they presumably had a reason to do that," said Rob Perks, a spokesman for the environmental group."

Let me guess, they wanted to 'jerk your chain'.

12 posted on 02/27/2002 2:24:36 PM PST by d14truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pray4liberty
LOL. I guess it all depends on the direction of the glacier.
13 posted on 02/27/2002 2:25:12 PM PST by kassie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Da Judge:

Judge Kessler was appointed to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in July 1994. She received a B.A. from Cornell University and an LL.B. from Harvard Law School. Following graduation, Judge Kessler was employed by the National Labor Relations Board, served as Legislative Assistant to a U.S. Senator and a U.S. Congressman, worked for the New York City Board of Education, and then opened a public interest law firm. In June 1977, she was appointed Associate Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. From 1981 to 1985, Judge Kessler served as Presiding Judge of the Family Division and was a major architect of one of the nation?s first Multi-Door Courthouses. She served as President of the National Association of Women Judges from 1983 to 1984, and now serves on the Executive Committee of the ABA?s Conference of Federal Trial Judges and the U.S. Judicial Conference's Committee on Court Administration and Management.

14 posted on 02/27/2002 2:25:47 PM PST by SBeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Right on. Good ruling.
15 posted on 02/27/2002 2:26:27 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Well I just don't want to be blamed for knocking the "Condit Freep" out of the category... :)
16 posted on 02/27/2002 2:27:14 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
You really live in the alternate universe, don't you?
17 posted on 02/27/2002 2:28:20 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
SUE FOR HILLARY HEALTH CARE RECORDS. THE JUDGE HAS APPROVED!
18 posted on 02/27/2002 2:28:48 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
This is just total 'BS'; and I thought Cheney had a good chance of protecting the appropriate branches of Government and their power; what gives?

An Appeal here? I hope so. . .

19 posted on 02/27/2002 2:30:12 PM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamole
The Berry ruling...yeah. I don't know about this one. I'd imagine so.

This is also the judge that blocked the release of AFL-CIO documents. A Clinton toady.

20 posted on 02/27/2002 2:30:37 PM PST by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson