To: r9etb
Obviously you don't think it's a matter of inflicting harm, as that would justify the use of force to prevent it from occurring. I'm not so sure it's all that "obvious" to me.
As I said in my first post... It's a tough call.
A good case could be made for either position.
71 posted on
02/28/2002 10:53:15 AM PST by
OWK
To: OWK
Isn't this the kind of call that the Supreme Court should be for, instead of deciding where we can spend our money before an election?
To: OWK
A good case could be made for either position. Maybe we could just take the middle road and start a non-profit charity that runs Public Service Ads and booths at various state fairs with the motto:
"Don't boink your sister."
It would need a catchy jingle of course.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson