[RightWhale]

You, too, can live on a leased lot on gummint land. It's no way to build a family estate, but it could be better than renting an apartment.

[BearCub]

You, too, can live on a leased lot on gummint land. It's no way to build a family estate, but it could be better than renting an apartment.

How exactly does one do this?

-bc

[BigBobber]

I'm familiar with some of these cabins. While some are cute, and no doubt historic, I don't see them as much more than a special priveledge for a select few on our public lands. A Scout or church camp would be different matter because of the larger numbers being able to use the facility.

What concerns me more about forest policy is the closing of roads, trails, or otherwise limiting access to areas the the public used to enjoy for hiking, camping, hunting, or whatever.

[editor-surveyor]

"You, too, can live on a leased lot on gummint land."

The true statist point of view.

First, there is no such thing as government land. - The constitution forbids government holding of land, other than military reservations, and the District of Columbia.

The National Forests are totally outside the provisions of the constitution, and at this time violate the unconstitutional statute that created them in the first place.

If you had any knowledge at all, you would realize that these cabins are not in any way substitutes for an apartment. They are located far from jobs, schools, and supermarkets, and most are not suitable for year around habitation.