Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/08/2002 8:49:58 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks
Mike Heiskell, a defense lawyer hired by Ms. Mallard's family, flatly denied the allegation of sex and said Mr. Biggs did not remain alive in the garage for three days.

Just another lying defense attorney. Attorneys are not alloyed to suborn perjury, but they have taken this to mean that they can say anything in defense of their clients that they are not positive is false. And many of them fail to meet even this standard.

2 posted on 03/08/2002 8:57:18 PM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Money-saving suggestion: Burn the b*tch at the same stake as Andrea Yates!
I'll even supply the gasoline.
And the match.
And the stake.
3 posted on 03/08/2002 9:01:23 PM PST by gbunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Okay, the autopsy revealed that Biggs suffered no internal injuries that would cause death. They ruled that he had bled to death.

It takes a LONG TIME to bleed to death from cuts and contusions like he had. The guy very likely COULD have lived 24 hours or more after the accident. Therefore, what was going on during that time? It sure wasn't this Mallard b**tch trying to get help for him.

Second, who cares if she had sex afterward or played pinochle? That's irrelevant. What we know she DIDN'T do was help the guy. What she DID was leave him there to die. All this other merde is just her attorney playing the cynical PR game with the news media hoping to influence potential jurors that "it wasn't as bad as you read," trying to impeach the "buzz" surrounding this thing.

The FACT is the guy died IN HER GARAGE. He probably died slowly. Her "friends" dumped the body. Months later she "giggled" as she mentioned to someone that "I hit this white guy."

The woman will be up for capital murder, never you fear.

7 posted on 03/08/2002 9:30:39 PM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"She didn't do anything to aid him," Lieutenant Paul said. "Originally, this was an accident. There was no crime. The crime occurred when she didn't do anything to come to his aid."

No Lieutenant Paul, the crime occurred the second she left the scene of the accident, and she left the accident scene with the victim attached to her windshield. Throw in leaving him in the garage to die and then trying to cover it up.

This is starting to smell bad.

8 posted on 03/08/2002 9:34:20 PM PST by X-FID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Why isn't this being prosecuted as a racist hate crime?
9 posted on 03/08/2002 9:57:28 PM PST by Taft in '52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
One of her classmates at Oscar Dean Wyatt High School said she was an A student who worked as a teacher's aide.

.........

Ms. Mallard's mother, Dorothy, testified in the hearing today that her daughter had been a Girl Scout who volunteered to help retarded children.

Girl Scout and "A student" wrongly attacked by the establishment and betrayed by a faithless friend....

She is the true victim here....

11 posted on 03/09/2002 5:16:58 AM PST by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
She told the police she had two drinks, while Ms. Daniel said she was drunk and had taken the drug Ecstasy.

Isn't that how it always is? It's always "two drinks". I have a feeling, though, that the informant isn't as reliable as we think she is. I don't mean to say she's lying, but I believe the defense will shred her credibility on the witness stand. Just being in the same group of friends as the killer puts her into the "pathetic loser" category.

12 posted on 03/09/2002 5:31:09 AM PST by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; mrustow
She also told the police that Ms. Mallard planned to destroy the car and make an insurance claim.

Somehow this claim of the informant sounds all too believable.

I wonder why the NY Times sees fit to inform us of the informant's name, but does not see fit to tell us that, according to that informant, Ms. Mallard said, "I hit this white guy," and giggled. Isn't that fit to print?

13 posted on 03/09/2002 5:39:31 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Ms. Mallard, born and raised in Fort Worth, was state certified as a nurse's aide. She had bounced between jobs at nursing homes in recent years.

At least the article tells us where this alleged human being was working. I had been wondering. Those poor old people at those nursing homes!

14 posted on 03/09/2002 5:40:53 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Sounds like she has found friends to lie on her behalf.
17 posted on 03/09/2002 10:20:12 AM PST by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Mike Heiskell, a defense lawyer hired by Ms. Mallard's family, flatly denied the allegation of sex and said Mr. Biggs did not remain alive in the garage for three days.

OH, so the poor suffering soul only was alive for one day--that makes it soooo much better!

19 posted on 03/09/2002 10:47:58 AM PST by scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"It was a stupid decision," Mr. Heiskell said of Ms. Mallard's failure to seek help.
No, a 'stupid decision' is when you decide to walk across the blazing hot parking lot in bare feet. This was barbaric.
22 posted on 03/13/2002 1:34:45 AM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson