Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enemy Of The State
and how is that relevent to the discussion at hand?
20 posted on 03/12/2002 7:27:16 PM PST by borghead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: borghead
Borghead, the history of the Harrier does not bear out your dismissive comments. The viability of the Harrier as a fighter has more to do with the training of the pilots and the quality of missiles and electronics carried by said Harriers, then it does with the formal performance statistics written down in Jane's or your favorite military book.

Royal Navy and British army Harriers (effectively equivalent to the AV-8A, the predecessor of the AV-8B) trounced Argentine Mirage fighters, French built aircraft arguably as good then as anything the Chinese have now. If the Chinese improved their training and had modern electronics and missiles equivalent to what we have, the fight would be more even, but I would not count the Harrier out - all other things being equal.

Again, the one advantage the Harrier has over other jet aircraft is that it can be hidden out in the boondocks, dispersed, so as to avoid being wiped out on the airfield, as will surely happen to most of Taiwan's air force if China decided to do so. Thirty Harriers may not be able to do much in the face of overwhelming numbers, but it is significantly better than nothing at all.

All this is predicated on the caveat, of course, that I don't know how well Taiwanese pilots are trained, and I do not know what quality of electronics or missiles these Harriers will be equipped with.

22 posted on 03/12/2002 7:40:14 PM PST by Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson