Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nemo
I won't fault the police for this one. By all appearances they did their job correctly. If a person can ignore a subpoena at will, them the court system fails.
2 posted on 03/20/2002 9:06:05 AM PST by Loopy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Loopy
If the court system served you a subpoena because they didn't like the way you cut your grass, would you tolerate it?

Mr. Wolk probably didn't have the money or the savvy to defend his property in court and he knew it. Who was he hurting? Why did he have to submit to a humiliating summons? What purpose is served in harassing a painfully shy old man?

If the system is wasting time and resources on such ridiculous nonsense in a city plagued by real crime and real criminals, then it will inevitably break down whether Mr. Wolk shows up for the charade or not.

5 posted on 03/20/2002 9:19:09 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Loopy
If a person can ignore a subpoena at will, them the court system fails.

Court system? We have millions upon millions of criminal illegal aliens running all over our streets. The courts don't seem too concerned about these criminals, do they?

9 posted on 03/20/2002 9:24:47 AM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Loopy
Given the fact that Henry A. Wolk had owned the house he made his home in and that he did not like other people arbitarily telling him what to do (based upon the inspectors reports they were clearly trespassing upon his property without a valid search warrant) this one goes into the whack em and stack em file.

The officer serving an arrest warrant was doing his job, the courts were doing their job and two men are dead unnecisarily becuase of a system that is in total disregard of the fundamental law of the land.

A housing court should not have any power over non rental property. It was his private property and the inspectors and courts levied fined against him totaling iver $14,000 without benefit of a jury trial. That house we may presume was held in fee simple by Mr. Wolk. How he maintained or did not maintain his property was nobody's business but his. He was not directly harming any of his neighbors and since he did not like strangers on his property they should have kept the H#ll out. Like I said two men are dead. Two people dead over 29 housibng code violations found last July.

"[I]nspectors found a rotting porch, missing stairs, missing gutters, torn siding, a collapsed porch and other dangers." Given the conditions in much of Chicago's less pleasent neighborhoods where landlords have a duty to tennants to maintain rental housing on the market (a case for the state regulation of commerce and a case of acting upon a tennant complaint) there is much more to this story than meets the eye. There is also a cse that can be made about excessive fines and unreasonable time limits imposed on Mr. Wolk. Of couse his greatest crime was he just wanted to be left alone by stangers. We can not have that after all it takes a village.

10 posted on 03/20/2002 9:27:54 AM PST by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Loopy
I won't fault the police for this one.

I should hope not; that's mighty big of you.

14 posted on 03/20/2002 9:34:09 AM PST by arm958
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Loopy
"He would bend over backwards to make sure there was no confrontation... he was always prepared." well, busting into someone's home with a sledgehammer is about as confronting as you can get... and not wearing a vest--he wasn't so prepared this time... this was handled terribly... it's almost like the sending the BATF with tanks and machine guns to handle a bunch of cult members waiting for the battle of armegeddon... but on a much smaller scale... very sad, indeed...
22 posted on 03/20/2002 9:43:35 AM PST by latina4dubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Loopy
"But he (the oficer) did what the warrant said. He knew the situation could turn deadly. He was always prepared."

Obviously not.

Some common sense would have saved the man his own life...next time, maybe.

Oops, there'll be no next time.

54 posted on 03/20/2002 10:43:09 AM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Loopy
I won't fault the police for this one. By all appearances they did their job correctly. If a person can ignore a subpoena at will, them the court system fails.

If the government doesn't recognize private property rights then the whole system fails.

63 posted on 03/20/2002 11:16:13 AM PST by NC_Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Loopy
"If a person can ignore a subpoena at will, them the court system fails."

Yeah, sort of like convicted murderers getting paroled after 7.

81 posted on 03/20/2002 12:01:33 PM PST by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Loopy
Was it worth it?
112 posted on 03/20/2002 1:13:05 PM PST by Maelstrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Loopy
I won't fault the police for this one. By all appearances they did their job correctly. If a person can ignore a subpoena at will, them the court system fails.

Wrong. They should have burned the bustard out.

If they flaunt authority in housing court we can assume that they will also litter and j-walk.

A firm hand is what Citizens need and want.

Our country is a littel safer today, no doubt due to the sacrifice of an officer totally unprepared for the task.

132 posted on 03/20/2002 2:04:09 PM PST by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson