Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teachers' feud with governor deepens - Davis opposes key labor bill after fund pitch rejected
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | May 2, 2002 | Greg Lucas

Posted on 05/02/2002 10:15:59 AM PDT by Gophack

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:40:14 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Coop
But in this case, I think Davis and Simon actually have some common ground. Davis doesn't want to give the unions control over curriculum and testing, and neither does Simon.

No, this is an extremist union proposal and the union brass are clearly in the wrong here. Davis may even be telling the truth when he says his opposition to these proposals is due to his principled stand, not a lack of contributions. Of course the teachers don't want to contribute to his campaign because they hate his principled stand. Would Davis sell out his principled stand for $1 million? That question deserves to be watched closely; if he flip-flops and gets the money, we should be prepared to call him out on it.

Testing actually works best in the losing inner city schools, as explained in an earlier FR article which I have no idea how to find again. The affluent schools hate testing because their students already do better than the tests require.

Again, this is net good news for Simon, since many teachers aren't going to see much difference between the two, perhaps not enough to campaign actively and enthusiastically for Davis.

The only thing that would get teachers to back Davis intensely are vouchers. Simon clearly (and rightly) supports vouchers, but previous voucher proposals have flopped at the polls. If it looks like Simon's going to win, the teachers may have to return to generous support of Davis to avoid vouchers. Because they can be well-organized when they need to be, teachers can be decisive in elections.

I think Simon would have a tough time getting a voucher plan passed, but teachers definitely don't want to take that chance; their budgets are at stake.

D

21 posted on 05/02/2002 1:12:26 PM PDT by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: daviddennis
Would Davis sell out his principled stand for $1 million?

Some questions answer themselves, don't they?

22 posted on 05/02/2002 4:28:53 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Gophack
The union decided to push the bills because they say their members' main gripe is the tests pupils must take and the weight given the results in determining cash rewards or sanctions. "Teachers hate the testing, the Academic Performance Index scores, the comparisons, the bonus awards, and it was his idea," Johnson said. "We made a major effort for him in 1998, and we feel betrayed."

Why are teachers always b!itching about themselves and their work being evaluated? If they hate the process that much they should change jobs.

However, I do think Davis blew it when he denied all the bonus money to any teachers because the budget was underfunded. My sister-in-law who teaches in Lemoore said her fellow teachers were very angry about being stiffed.

Go Simon!

23 posted on 05/02/2002 4:46:41 PM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion
However, I do think Davis blew it when he denied all the bonus money to any teachers because the budget was underfunded. My sister-in-law who teaches in Lemoore said her fellow teachers were very angry about being stiffed.

That's the thing with Democrats ... promise, promise, promise and don't follow through. He made the promise for campaign contributions and votes; he broke it. But we have another election!

Go Simon!

24 posted on 05/02/2002 4:58:12 PM PDT by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Gophack
Teachers feuding with Davis -- do you think they will vote for Simon?
25 posted on 05/02/2002 6:24:51 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gophack
Gravy Davis!
26 posted on 05/02/2002 6:28:50 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gophack
bttt
27 posted on 05/02/2002 6:47:48 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gophack
I wonder if the teachers' unions have decided that Davis is going to lose, and are seeing to it that they do not overly antagonize Simon.
28 posted on 05/02/2002 6:51:13 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: green team 1999
Gray has more and more problems smothering him. This is fun to watch.
29 posted on 05/02/2002 8:42:40 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Teachers feuding with Davis -- do you think they will vote for Simon?

That's a good question. I don't know. First, I know that not ALL the teachers are Democrats and support Davis, though they trend liberal. But what are their *key* issues? (other than the obvious -- education).

On education, Davis has done nothing substantive. He promised bonuses for exemplary performance, but didn't deliver because of the budget crisis (though prison guards got a nice 30%+ raise).

What are their other issues? Probably like everyone else ... across the gamut.

I don't know if they will support Simon ... however, I can see them taking a powder on the race.

30 posted on 05/02/2002 9:38:36 PM PDT by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
bump
31 posted on 05/02/2002 10:10:54 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Maybe, maybe not.

Is US$1 million enough to compensate for the negative political fallout from centrist voters who resent the power of the teachers' union? He may figure those nice folks are sure Simon votes if he doesn't hold the line against the union, while at the same time the union members themselves have nowhere else to go. If this is what he's thinking, I must agree with him, and in that context, I wouldn't take the $1 million.

Of course he's going to take that US$1 million and teachers' union support if he feels activity at the grass roots is vital to him winning. This means the odds are still pretty good that he'll cave, but I think it's definitely not as cut and dried as you might think.

D

32 posted on 05/02/2002 10:44:30 PM PDT by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Oh - before you react to this, please note that I'm not crediting Davis with a principled act or decision. Like Clinton, it's all about votes. I don't doubt that he will sell out to any group that he thinks he can get away with selling out to. But are teachers' unions one of those groups? Maybe, maye not.

D

33 posted on 05/02/2002 10:46:47 PM PDT by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: daviddennis
I don't doubt that he will sell out to any group that he thinks he can get away with selling out to.

I guess that means that we are in pretty close agreement. I was naturally reacting to the point 'Would Davis sell out his principled stand for $1 million?', to which the answer IS obvious. The points you are making simply point out that, on net, he mightn't be getting anything he cares about, i.e. winning, and that would prevent him from selling out for nothing, or for less than nothing.

34 posted on 05/02/2002 11:31:40 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: daviddennis
Good input. Thanks. But if Simon can get even a few disillusioned teachers to bash Davis for him...
35 posted on 05/03/2002 4:18:28 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Oh certainly, yes. No question we're in basic agreement on that issue.

D

36 posted on 05/03/2002 7:00:02 AM PDT by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Gophack
That daycare thing started down here with an article in the OC Register which I posted!

I'll look for it!

37 posted on 05/03/2002 10:11:15 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gophack
He promised bonuses for exemplary performance, but didn't deliver because of the budget crisis (though prison guards got a nice 30%+ raise).

What a comparison. I guess you could say that education is not Davis' priority! LOL! This could be a great ad for the Republicans. 'Dollars for criminals, but not for education'

38 posted on 05/03/2002 10:19:36 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Actually, I think that what this shows is that unions that give him money get raises, unions that don't get sh*t.

No quid pro quo? Hard to prove THAT one in court. If it ever gets to trial (ha, ha), they would have to have a change of venue ... out of state!

Dump Davis!

39 posted on 05/04/2002 7:30:24 AM PDT by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson