Lots of pork flyin' around Capitol Hill...And Congress just keeps on porkin' us!
Posted on 06/06/2002 9:57:24 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
Senate OKs $31.5B Anti-Terror Bill
By ALAN FRAM
.c The Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Senate gave overwhelming approval early Friday to a counterterrorism bill costing more than $31.5 billion, ignoring a White House veto threat and setting up a politically tinged showdown over the price tag for domestic security.
After four days of debate, senators approved the legislation by 71-22, despite objections by the Bush administration and many Republicans that it was too expensive. The post-midnight vote followed a testy final flurry in which a few dozen amendments were accepted but scores of others were dropped over the angry protests of several senators.
Passage came hours after President Bush announced his proposal to merge federal anti-terror efforts into a Cabinet-level Department of Homeland Security and declared that America was waging ``a titanic struggle against terror.''
With that backdrop, Senate Republican leaders decided against dragging debate into next week on a package laden with funds for U.S. troops, airport safety and other popular initiatives. Instead, they will count on upcoming House-Senate negotiations on a final version to pare it or produce a bill that Bush would veto - just as this year's campaigns for congressional control are ramping up.
``Clearly the bill has gotten out of control,'' said Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss, but ``to just drag this out into next week would not be a positive thing.''
Bush proposed a $27.1 billion anti-terror package in March, and the House approved a $29 billion bill in May. The spending is for the remaining months of the federal budget year that ends Sept. 30.
Democrats chided GOP critics of the bill, which mostly contains funds for the military, FBI, efforts to thwart cyber- and bioterrorism, and other responses to the Sept. 11 attacks.
``Tell your people back home they don't need this protection,'' said Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Robert Byrd, D-W.Va. ``Tell them, don't tell us.''
Sens. Phil Gramm, R-Texas, and John McCain, R-Ariz., unsuccessfully offered a series of amendments to underline their point that piggybacked onto the bill were pet projects and other items that were not dire emergencies. They also argued that the Appropriations panel included projects that were scheduled for next year to ease a budget crunch expected then.
Even so, the Senate time and again refused to strip items from the legislation, underlining the Appropriations Committee's power and Congress' long tradition of attaching parochial items to must-pass bills.
By 65-31, the Senate refused to remove language providing $2.5 million for mapping Hawaiian coral reefs. Supporters of the funds said the provision steered money approved last year to an effort to protect endangered ocean life, but Gramm and McCain said the provision showed how some lawmakers were using the bill.
The Senate also rebuffed by 66-30 an effort to remove $2 million to help the Smithsonian Institution plan a storage facility for its animal specimens preserved in 730,000 gallons of flammable alcohol.
Working through a stack of amendments, senators voted 75-19 to forbid U.S. cooperation with the international war crimes tribunal, a permanent court that starts operations next month and has been opposed by the president. The House has approved a nearly identical ban.
The Senate boosted the bill's cost a bit by voting 79-14 for a proposal by Sens. Bill Frist, R-Tenn., and Jesse Helms, R-N.C., to double to $200 million the bill's funds for fighting AIDS overseas. A Democratic effort to boost the total to $500 million was rejected 49-46.
Gramm also blocked inclusion of a bipartisan deal reached among some top senators that would have set a cap on next year's spending and set procedures for enforcing that limit. The figure - which excludes benefits such as Social Security - was $768 billion, $9 billion more than Bush proposed and $29 billion higher than is to be spent this year.
Many lawmakers want such an agreement because bipartisan fights have blocked passage of a congressional budget this year that would limit spending. But Gramm and other conservatives want to hold out for a lower figure.
The anti-terror bill contains $5.5 billion to help New York's recovery from the World Trade Center destruction, $200 million for Israel and $50 million for humanitarian aid to Palestinians and $100 million to fight AIDS in poor nations.
But highlighting how the measure would also help local interests, it has $2.5 million for research in Greenport, N.Y., on foot and mouth disease; $73 million for relief from floods in Virginia, West Virginia, Illinois, Michigan and Kentucky; and language directing the Agriculture Department not to carry out Bush's budget proposal to cut federal honey bee research.
06/07/02 00:35 EDT
You hit the target! Pork! My question is, where are we getting all this money from? Man someones generation is going to pay a huge price...
Isn't that what bookies do? Set the line?
Now we know what that "scuba-diving terrorist" alert was all about.
Lots of pork flyin' around Capitol Hill...And Congress just keeps on porkin' us!
As far as I know, Bush has already said he would veto it in its current form. Then the Senate made it worse. He'll flush it.
Hope he vetos but I doubt he does. He issued the threat but since he hasn't issued a veto yet, the Senate is calling his bluff. We shall see. Has to go to conference first, I believe. The House bill is 29 billion, the Senate 31.5 billion. Bet they split the difference and settle on 30 billion and W will sign it.
BTW, I'm not trying to be cynical just realistic.
So, shall we bet? A margarita for the winner?
Let me predict what will happen.
The House has passed a bill that is higher than what Bush wanted. The Senate has passed a bill that is even higher yet. Bush has been defeated by Congrss again.
In conference committee they will all work out a compromise which Bush will have to sign and everyone will blame Bush.
Then, the professional BushWhackers will come out and try to electronically lynch him again. We will stuff them as usual, and the reality will be that GW won again.
Dirty Byrd must have porked up this bill a lot re his comments. I thought that every square inch of W. VA was paved or a National Park by now. If we just gave that money to every citizen of WV directly each year, they would be the richest people in America. However, a lot of rats are in line for that pork. Pork $'s, the main import and economic mainstay of WVA!
As you and I previously discussed, the Senate Dems are still silent on the EPA Climate Report.
You called it re the Rats not wanting to vote on that Climate Report. Their vote could cost them a their jobs this year or in two years, regardless of which way they vote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
