Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/11/2002 10:00:53 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks
Both sides on the California offshore oil issue are pathetic. It is a case of pure politics, and that's why I plan on getting out of offshore oil and gas all together.

Pardon me if I issue some plain old facts into the argument.

The State of California has made a $hitload of money from offshore oil and gas. Indeed, much of the University of California and California State University systems were built up in the 1950's and 1960's on the plentiful petroleum revenue coming to the State. Some of California's offshore oil and gas leases have been in existence since the late 1920's and early 1930's. The Davis people commit "lies of omission" when the claim otherwise (the rationale is that the leases were "renewed" under a new name, so they aren't really that old - WRONG!!).

There are oil and gas leases in the California Tidelands and Submerged lands, ranging from Point Conception at the west end of the Santa Barbara Channel, to offshore Orange County - included granted lands in the Santa Monica Bay!

The first Federal leases were issued in 1963 off of NORTHERN and CENTRAL California. Some of the wells drilled on these leases discovered oil, but not in sufficient quality or quantity to justify development at 1960's prices. It was only after California lost a major US Suprme court case concerning jurisdiction in the Santa Barbara Channel, to the Federal Government in 1965, that they began to sour on offshore oil and gas. Then the (highly overrated) drilling accident off of Santa Barbara galvanized local environmental resistance. Then politics, rather than good policy, stuck its ugly nose in the game, and it hasn't been the same since.

The State of Florida did issue offshore oil and gas leases in the 1950's and 1960's. There were very few, and nothing of substance was ever developed from them. In California, almost 2 billions barrels have come from California waters, and almost 1 billion barrels from Federal waters there. The Federal waters still have significant proven reserves, and significant unexplored potential. For a State with a near 20 billion dollar budget shortfall, a crumbling infrastructure, declining schools, and a State that suffered from severe energy shortages last summer, Gov. Davis sure has a lousy energy policy. But, he hopes, it will buy him the "green vote" and that's all he really cares about anyway.

2 posted on 06/11/2002 10:49:40 PM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

3 posted on 06/11/2002 10:50:13 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
ping
5 posted on 06/12/2002 3:37:26 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; Ernest_at_the_Beach
When Bill Clinton was president, folks happily agreed that Clinton should pass goodies onto the Golden State because they helped him win the White House. Friends help friends. But when President Bush helps.....

I think this is why Democratic Senators like Losserman, Chuckie Schumer, Hillary, Boxer, Feinstein, Murray, and Cant-vote-well are all so despirate about finding an issue for this fall's elections. They know that if the Dems don't control the House and don't control the Senate, their life will not be pleasant. They got a taste of things until they bribed one RINO sentator.

10 posted on 06/12/2002 1:20:18 PM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson