Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O'Reilly: Bush Insider Claims Clinton Deal Torpedoed Pardongate
News max ^ | 06/21/2002 | With Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 06/21/2002 6:46:21 PM PDT by dts32041

O'Reilly: Bush Insider Claims Clinton Deal Torpedoed Pardongate

A Bush administration insider has privately leaked word that a deal was struck between Democratic congressional leaders and the Bush White House not to prosecute Bill and/or Hillary Clinton on an array of charges related to the Pardongate scandal, Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly claimed Friday on his nationally syndicated "Radio Factor" show.

"A very highly placed source - and I mean this guy knows what's going on in the Bush administration - told me about a month ago that when President Bush took office he had meetings with all of the Democratic leadership.... one on one meetings in the Oval Office," O'Reilly said.

"The Democratic leadership made it quite clear to Mr. Bush that he would not get any cooperation - zero - on the part of the Democrats in the Senate and in the House if he pursued any kind of a criminal investigation against Bill Clinton."

O'Reilly said that according to his source, "Basically they said look, if you embarrass us - by us we mean the Democratic Party - if you, Bush-Ashcroft, indict Clinton on bribery or go after Hillary or any of this - we're gonna shut you down. We're not gonna do anything. You're not going to get any (legislation) passed if four years."

The talk host's highly placed administration source said Democrat leaders then explained to Bush, "If you put this thing on the back track and just play the game the way we've always played it here in the Justice Department since Watergate, where the powerful protect each other - then we'll keep an open mind on your legislation."

O'Reilly never indicated who his source might be beyond describing him as "very highly placed."

On Thursday, U.S. Attorney for New York's Southern District James Comey, a Bush appointee, ended a key part of the probe into whether the Clintons traded pardons for political favors and campaign contributions.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; bushknew; bushknew911; clinton; oreilly; pardongate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-186 next last
No comment, just wondered why this hasn't Shown up before?
1 posted on 06/21/2002 6:46:25 PM PDT by dts32041
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dts32041
Notice how Bush caved into these threats.
2 posted on 06/21/2002 6:51:06 PM PDT by LarryM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
they obviously haven't kept their word, perhaps he should do something before the statute of limitations runs out.
3 posted on 06/21/2002 6:51:30 PM PDT by coug97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryM
The talk host's highly placed administration source said Democrat leaders then explained to Bush, "If you put this thing on the back track and just play the game the way we've always played it here in the Justice Department since Watergate, where the powerful protect each other - then we'll keep an open mind on your legislation."

And of course, haven't you noticed the Senate has been soooo cooperative with Bush because they were afraid he might renege and go back and open up Pardongate again.

Bullfeathers!

The Senate has not been cooperative, his judicial nominees have been stalled, etc. If this is true and there was a deal, then we wouldn't see little Tommy Daschle being the obstructionist that he is.

4 posted on 06/21/2002 6:54:19 PM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
- if you, Bush-Ashcroft, indict Clinton on bribery or go after Hillary or any of this - we're gonna shut you down. We're not gonna do anything.

So, did I miss the indictment?

5 posted on 06/21/2002 6:55:09 PM PDT by Northpaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
You gotta love those Democrats, they say they'll torpedo legislation, shut the country down to protect the criminal President and his wife from answering for their crimes. It had to be a bluff and apparently W fell for it.
6 posted on 06/21/2002 6:55:56 PM PDT by Aria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
we're gonna shut you down. We're not gonna do anything. You're not going to get any (legislation) passed if four years."

Gee if the first 2 years of Bush's presidency is any indication of what they consider passing legislation than we're definately getting shafted.

This is a crock, Dash-hole and co. have been anything but cooperative so far, why should the Republicans expect anything else in the next 2 years?

MKM

7 posted on 06/21/2002 6:58:03 PM PDT by mykdsmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
Who is this insider? Not a Bush loyalist, obviously.

I don't believe this is true, and I think the story came from the leader of the Axis of Whining Weasels,

BILL KRISTOL!!

8 posted on 06/21/2002 6:59:29 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
That makes alot of sense (not). during a war, he could have seriously started going into the Clinton scandals and used the democraps worthelss threat against them in Nov.

"Look folks, we are at war and congress did nothing, presumably due to the Clinton investigation. If this is how congress is ran, then i think the American people can make up their own mind." - Bush around Nov elections (i hope)
9 posted on 06/21/2002 7:00:36 PM PDT by smith288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I don't believe this is true

Neither do I, Miss M.

10 posted on 06/21/2002 7:02:19 PM PDT by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mykdsmom
If the true sovereigns of this once great republic were paying any attention to the criminal enterprises of federal politics, pursuing the criminal highjinxer, sinkemperor Willy, would be worth it, but the people don't appear to give a tinkers damn about cleaning up government 'of the people by the people'. It is a crisis of disinterest and the bread and circuses mentality of the American people that is at fault, not the Bush administration or John Ashcroft. 'We the people' get what we deserve for our inattention.
11 posted on 06/21/2002 7:04:36 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
Maybe Bush should turn the tables on those Dems.......tell them that if they don't pass his programs/nominations he IS going after the clintons etc.
12 posted on 06/21/2002 7:05:15 PM PDT by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041

13 posted on 06/21/2002 7:08:15 PM PDT by rface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryM
Notice how Bush caved into these threats.

Bunk! Dubya is a decent and a wise man who does what he believes is RIGHT, I'm sure the LAST thing he would do is worry about the Democrats!

14 posted on 06/21/2002 7:08:46 PM PDT by Mahone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
GW doesn't look like anyone who would tolerate being threatened, especially not from little Tom. For this to be believable,career prosecutors, with good reputations, would have to ignore evidence of crimes.That would make them culpable in a crime cover up. Pure fantasy on O'Reilly's "sources".
15 posted on 06/21/2002 7:08:48 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
#11

Your words ring too true my friend.

16 posted on 06/21/2002 7:09:15 PM PDT by Tourist Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
This sounds like a very large load of horsefeathers to me!

Note that this secret deal supposedly took place when Bush took office and yet it included Ashcroft ..... who was not confirmed for quite a while after that and then only after a very nasty fight ..... well, one side was fighting dirty, anyway.

17 posted on 06/21/2002 7:10:19 PM PDT by kayak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
Sorry, I don't believe this. If the Dems threatened that, the GOP would have loved to leak it. Perhaps more like it is that the Dems suggested that pursuing Clinton might prove to be a distraction to a fresh start.
18 posted on 06/21/2002 7:11:29 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Kristol again, eh. All roads lead to Kristol. Otherwise, I agree with you. This simply isn't the way things work.
19 posted on 06/21/2002 7:12:19 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn; Miss Marple
Neither do I. President Bush had his own plans for his administration and they did not include starting out "Clinton-bashing." He has ignored Clinton in the same way he did not acknowledge Arafat for many months.
He does not even say the word Clinton.
20 posted on 06/21/2002 7:12:42 PM PDT by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Just think

A nation that will drive across town to save a nickel on gallon of gas, but the government steals and squanders trillions over the years and few care enough to give it a couple of minutes of thought in their lives.

Thousands of dollars per person per year pissed away, no one cares! We get the government we deserve.

21 posted on 06/21/2002 7:13:22 PM PDT by listenhillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I think even if there was a picture of GW shooting someone and then doing a victory dance on the dead body, you will still not accept any criticism of the President. There is no difference between you and the Clinton loyalists.
22 posted on 06/21/2002 7:18:12 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I agree with Miss Marple. This stinks like Bill Kristol.
23 posted on 06/21/2002 7:18:48 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
GW doesn't look like anyone who would tolerate being threatened

Are you nuts? GW does not need to be threatened. All he needs to be told is that his poll number may diminish. That is enough for him to strike any deal.

24 posted on 06/21/2002 7:20:41 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Torie
I dont think those were the words that were used. There are lots of ways to threaten someone without being confrontational.
25 posted on 06/21/2002 7:22:32 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
Sadly, I believe every word of this. I always thought in some way the Bush's were being blackmailed. The evidence against those two clinton creeps was too obvious. It's now up to Larry Klayman and I've given up on him.
26 posted on 06/21/2002 7:27:59 PM PDT by Lucky2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
If you ask me, this:

O'Reilly said that according to his source, "Basically they said look, if you embarrass us - by us we mean the Democratic Party - if you, Bush-Ashcroft, indict Clinton on bribery or go after Hillary or any of this - we're gonna shut you down. We're not gonna do anything. You're not going to get any (legislation) passed if four years."

is all the more reason to take them to the mat. Threaten me and I kick your ass! That's the American way! That's the Texan way. Get the TRUTH out there for all to see and then let the chips fall where they may. I believe that public opinion will go with honesty and decency. Caving in will only lower the Bush administration down to the level of the Clintons.

You can't fight a war if the people don't believe in you and your word, Mr. President. Do the right thing!!! We will support you. We've been waiting for it, longing for it, praying for it, even begging for it. Justice needs to prevail. Tell the truth about the Clintons. Any Democrat still around after the voters get the truth will most likely be with you. Have faith!

27 posted on 06/21/2002 7:28:08 PM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aria
It had to be a bluff and apparently W fell for it.

My guess would be that Xlintons have dirt on all of them. One of those "If I go down, we're all going down" kinda things.

28 posted on 06/21/2002 7:28:54 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Satadru
There's a lot of difference between Miss M and Clinton loyalists. She's smarter and she's prettier

and she's right.

29 posted on 06/21/2002 7:31:57 PM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
Should be easy to find out. Did The President have meetings one on one with each rat last year?
30 posted on 06/21/2002 7:32:51 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: altura
Since you say so, it must be true.
31 posted on 06/21/2002 7:36:56 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
If this is true, then congressional democrat leaders ought to be investigated for obstucting justice and threatening our President.

Moreover, actually, just how much legislation, promulgation, restriction can we possibly need. This is why term limits is so appealing and necessary, IMHO.

32 posted on 06/21/2002 7:40:52 PM PDT by harpo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpo11
And shouldnt the President be investigated for possible cover-up?
33 posted on 06/21/2002 7:42:40 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
So far all we have is O'Reilly on this. I will wait and see where we go from here. Somehow I can't see President Bush caving to blackmail. I can however, see him want to save his first two years in office from being sucked up by more Clinton all the time.
34 posted on 06/21/2002 7:44:20 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryM
"Notice how Bush caved into these threats."

Notice how quickly you believed such a thing happened.

I mean, think about it....President Bush is sworn in and according to this, the leadership of the DNC goes to him and basically threatens him. Somehow, I can't imagine how a Daschle, Gehbardt, or even Terry McAuliffe could get to Bush for these clandestine meetings without the media picking up on at least a sniff of covert coercion, and threats to the presidency. This doesn't pass the "make sense" test.

What does make sense, maddening but logical sense, is that President Bush didn't need to be coerced. Remember his campaign pledge not to play the politics of personal destruction? Remember that during all the Clinton scandals, Governor and then candidate Bush never never involved himself in the Washington scene. He never commented, criticized, or interjected himself into any of it, except to pledge to restore honor and integrity to the White House, which he has done.

What I can easily believe is that President Bush and Ashcroft decided that the prosecution of Bill Clinton would not become a detrimental part of this administration, that they would not "go after" him, that President Bush's agenda was more important than Bill Clinton.

As much as I wanted to see Bill Clinton get more than a slap on the wrist, a piddling fine, impeachment, and disbarrment, as much as I longed for revenge worthy of 8 years, I believe President Bush made a personal committment to put the good of the country over the satisfaction of making Bill and Hillary Clinton pay for their personal corruption.

I'm a mean spirited bitch,who would have spent the rest of my life going after Bill Clinton, Hillary,Al Gore, James Carville, especially the democrats in congress, and all the Clinton enablers who didn't have the patriotism to acknowledge and eliminate Clintons' corruption, which infected all branches of government, the Justice Dept, INS, IRS, CIA, FBI, the military. But you know what? I'm glad President Bush is a better man than me.

35 posted on 06/21/2002 7:45:53 PM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Torie; Miss Marple
All roads lead to Kristol.
******

LOL.... No all roads lead to the NWO and Burger Builders and they must have their investments protected at all cost. No pipelines through Afghanistan, Russian oil, China goods, NAFTA, etc. Kristol is the delivery vehicle for the messages.... stay turned for the next "highly placed sourced" leak.
36 posted on 06/21/2002 7:46:47 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wingnuts'nbolts
O'Reilly and an anonymous person who claims to be an "insider" ...... really reliable source he has there.
37 posted on 06/21/2002 7:46:57 PM PDT by kayak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123; thinden; OKCSubmariner; mancini; Sal; rdavis84; Uncle Bill
"The Democratic leadership made it quite clear to Mr. Bush that he would not get any cooperation - zero - on the part of the Democrats in the Senate and in the House if he pursued any kind of a criminal investigation against Bill Clinton."

Such a simple answer to such a corrupt cabal.

Don't take it personally YaYa, but that's how I see it.

38 posted on 06/21/2002 7:54:12 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kayak
"Notice how Bush caved into these threats."

It's amazing how people are so quick to believe those "anonymous" sources. Could be that O'Reilly was just set up. The Demos would love the turn teh Base against Bush at any cost.

39 posted on 06/21/2002 7:59:13 PM PDT by gramho12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
"No comment, just wondered why this hasn't Shown up before?"

Because O'Reilly is full of himself. Who is this high level source? Carl Rove? Rove would lie and sell his grandmother for politics. I think O'Reilly should either come clean or shut up. This mounts to blackmailing a sitting President. I got a feeling this is total bull or is that bill. AAH, it doesn't matter it means the same! HOGWASH!

40 posted on 06/21/2002 7:59:39 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
This is a no brainer. It has been obvious since Day one that Bush considers polititions to be above the law. EVERYTHING has been swept under the rug. He has spit on justice. He has spit on one of the most sacred principles of this country. I voted for him and yet it is this very issue that first convinced me that he was bad for America. And then it got even worse.
41 posted on 06/21/2002 7:59:44 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
You owe me a new keyboard! I just spewed my 7-up all over!!

(That is a great spoof quarter. Congratulations.)

42 posted on 06/21/2002 8:05:57 PM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
"Notice how quickly you believed such a thing happened."

NO! I aready knew this was happening. Has been since Day one on different issues. So when this story came out it just confirms what I aready knew to be obvious.

43 posted on 06/21/2002 8:06:11 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Satadru
There is no difference between you and the Clinton loyalists.

Obviously you haven't been paying attention to our Miss Marple. She gets her licks in occasionally, when necessary, it just hasn't been very necessary because she and I and most others are not looking for philosophical purity, we're looking for honesty and integrity which GWB has in spades! But I agree with her 100%! Just the fact that this supposed leak is so hush hush, made me immediately suspicious! Folks in the Bush White House are VERY loyal, out of respect for their boss. That's why you HAVEN'T seen any leaking going on from the White House. Plenty has been going on down the Avenue at the Capitol, though.

Many folks here on FR would love nothing more than to see x42 and #97 in orange jumpsuits, but I doubt it will ever happen. There have been too many ready to cover up for those two because of their hatred of conservatives in general and Republicans in particular, or because they had quietly received word that they shouldn't say anything if they want to continue in their present positions. Then you have to consider that folks in the media think x42 is the greatest thing since sliced bread so they'll carry the water for him EVERY TIME!

There has been a judgement somewhere in the Justice Dept. that there would not be enough evidence THAT WOULD CONVINCE A JURY IN DC of the guilt of the Clintons. Remember, bringing a case before a jury is not enough, you have to depend on 12 people who couldn't get out of jury duty to understand your case and vote for conviction. Do you HONESTLY see that happening? I don't, so why spin our wheels and waste our time on it. If the weenies in the Senate didn't see fit to convict him, why would 12 folks in DC?

I believe the President and the Justice Dept. have more important things to take care of right now, and that pair of lying toon scumbags don't even need to be on their radar!

44 posted on 06/21/2002 8:06:11 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
"I believe the President and the Justice Dept. have more important things to take care of right now, and that pair of lying toon scumbags don't even need to be on their radar!"

And I hope that the Justice system has more important things to do if you are every in need of any justice.

You cheapen the very meaning of justice for all.

It disqusts me.

45 posted on 06/21/2002 8:09:12 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
Bush said, "... if you harbor a terrorist, if you feed a terrorist, if you try to hide a terrorist, you, yourself, are just as guilty as the terrorist." So why isn't he going after the Democrats for covering for Klintoon?
46 posted on 06/21/2002 8:09:16 PM PDT by Andy from Beaverton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
The situation is hopeless. Whatever was in those 800 FBI files has cost us our Republic.
47 posted on 06/21/2002 8:10:31 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dts32041

This pathetic piece of "news" is a transparent con job. The Bush administration had no intention of ever pursuing any criminal charges in this case, and this information was leaked simply to provide an excuse for themselves.

48 posted on 06/21/2002 8:11:13 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz; Uncle Bill
"A Bush administration insider has privately leaked word that a deal was struck between Democratic congressional leaders and the Bush White House not to prosecute Bill and/or Hillary Clinton on an array of charges related to the Pardongate scandal, Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly claimed Friday on his nationally syndicated "Radio Factor" show."

Way back, about late '97, there was an accusation made by the poster NDCORUP that there was every evidence in a matter he'd exposed that involved some Judges, Sheriffs, County officials, etc. that there was a "Star Chamber" type of system set up by the elite levels.

No real harm came to the ones that were exposed, they just got "unemployed" in their cherished positions. That's what the norm is now, and most of us know it.

49 posted on 06/21/2002 8:12:58 PM PDT by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: rface
A picture of CLinton Head-quarters?
50 posted on 06/21/2002 8:21:28 PM PDT by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson