[liberallarry]

See post #34.

And try replying with facts instead of insults. I'm going by what I read in the L.A. Times. I said in my original post that I'm dependent on the accuracy of the story. I'm still waiting for refutation.

[WOSG]

See post #30. Apologies for insinuating you didnt believe what you wrote. I dont trust the LA Times fully, neither should you. The reversal was legally correct.