[mhking]

The author's first amendment rights are fully in operation if Namblazon declines to sell this book.

The hell with the author. I'm talking about censoring the rights of others. You don't want to buy the book? Great! Neither do I. But you telling me that simply because they make it available, that Amazon (and according to you, Jeff Bezos) is guilty by association, is simply not so.

This is not an issue of supporting the exploitation and assault of children. You must separate the two. You appear either incapable or unwilling to do so.

[yendu bwam]

The hell with the author. I'm talking about censoring the rights of others. You don't want to buy the book? Great! Neither do I. But you telling me that simply because they make it available, that Amazon (and according to you, Jeff Bezos) is guilty by association, is simply not so.

You are completely and totally wrong. There is NO right to have others sell your books. NONE. There's NOTHING in the Constitution (or anywhere else) which confers such a 'right.' As for Namblazon being guilty by association, anybody with a sliver of common sense knows that when you give a (HUGE) platform to a man who promotes evil, you are complicit in that evil. The people who gave Adolph H. a platform in pre-war Germany were just like Jeff NAMBLA Bezos.

[yendu bwam]

This is not an issue of supporting the exploitation and assault of children. You must separate the two. You appear either incapable or unwilling to do so.

When you aid, big-time, in the dissemination of the idea that child rape is OK, you are complicit. Jeff NAMBLA Bezos is an enemy of children.