To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Ping
To: John Jorsett
Well, I'll be horn-swoggled!
DUMP DAVI$ & the Den of Socialists
GO SIMON
Tom McClintock for CA State Controller
To: John Jorsett
the entire sample was weighted slightly to conform with census figures for sex, race, age, education, region and registration What does that mean?
Sounds like they threw out results if they had more white folks than latinos according to the census and registration ?
People don't put their race on the registration form so how would they know how many to throw out.
4 posted on
10/04/2002 10:03:05 AM PDT by
stalin
To: John Jorsett
You post some good articles regarding California, but please click on "California" under topics when posting so the articles appear under the CA forum.
Thank you.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; ElkGroveDan; kellynla
ping
To: John Jorsett
I thank the polling was done in paid toilets....
7 posted on
10/04/2002 10:08:18 AM PDT by
jdontom
To: John Jorsett
Bump and dump Davis.
9 posted on
10/04/2002 10:10:59 AM PDT by
NEWwoman
To: John Jorsett
The Times' sin was not push-polling -- it was being too obvious about it.
To: John Jorsett; ElkGroveDan
I hadn't seen this! Great post!
With Simon's new commercial, I think he's going to be moving up. We can get discouraged, we are within striking distance ...
Go Simon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
17 posted on
10/04/2002 11:21:05 AM PDT by
Gophack
To: dpwiener
I think you'll find this interesting, in light of what you posted the other day.
To: John Jorsett
Polling experts criticized the Times' projection that election turnout will favor Democrats by 13 percent, 53 to 40: four points more than Democrats' statewide registration advantage So that's how the LAT inflated their poll numbers for all the democrats. Someone mentioned it on the first thread about the poll, too. I doubt that low turnout will necessarily help the democrats in a clean election, since they have such an unlikeable candidate. But, maybe the LAT is compensating for expected vote fraud in a low-turnout election.
I wonder whether the LAT "normalizing" method also had other unrealistic extrapolations. Lets say they normalized the Hispanic portion of responses to the census data of Hispanic people as a fraction of total population in the state instead of to the percent of registered voters who are Hispanic, which is lower but unknown. This would really help the democrats' numbers, too.
24 posted on
10/04/2002 5:43:36 PM PDT by
heleny
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson