Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge

Interesting these paragraphs are side-by-side. Simon lost by 5% (assuming absentee ballots keep the number the same), so Simon captured more of the "decline-to-state" "moderates" than Davis did.

Somebody posted hard numbers of the murky middle cross-overs, but I can't find it right now.

Not too bad considering Davis' $20-30 bucks per vote.

But still, Simon's loss is our loss.

17 posted on 11/07/2002 10:20:39 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CounterCounterCulture
Let's not kid ourselves... the Greenie got 5% of the vote. Those commie pukes would have gone with Davis if they had thought the election was close. There really wasn't much of a chance with Simon given Davis' advantages and Simon's inept campaign.

Lest we forget our history, Pete Wilson won re-election in 1994 with high unfavorables, and the 'Rats stormed back 4 years later. Prior to 1998, CA had 16 years of continuous rule by Republican governors. Maybe the pendulum will swing back in 2006. Maybe.

20 posted on 11/07/2002 11:28:38 AM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson