1 posted on
01/14/2003 10:07:25 AM PST by
Weimdog
To: Weimdog
Chapman also criticized the way the Davis administration counted money that it expected, but did not have, as a deficit helping to inflate figures.In private business, if one did this without disclosing the fact, it would open one up to charges of fraud.
2 posted on
01/14/2003 10:14:32 AM PST by
elbucko
(Repeal the Nineteenth Amendment!)
To: Weimdog
"One of things about economists is they have a lot of different ways to look at the same set of facts,'' Ackerman said.So do politicians, Ackerman. So do politicians.
3 posted on
01/14/2003 10:17:53 AM PST by
elbucko
(Repeal the Nineteenth Amendment!)
To: Weimdog
This is astounding in the least! I fervently hope that the lower figure is true and can be definitively proved! I hope all voters will be as LIVID as I am at this point. The obvious scenario here is that the Governor and his disgusting fellow RATS have engineered a false deficit with the sole purpose of plundering the beleagured taxpayer again! Uh, what word am I looking for here. Let me think. Yes, I have it. BA...ARDS!!!!!!
To: Weimdog
Also, I forwarded a copy to Ray Appleton and Bill Manders in Fresno. This article needs to be forwarded to all Republican Senators and Assemblymen, and to all conservative talk show hosts in California.
To: NormsRevenge; madfly; Dog Gone; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SierraWasp
A lot of us were wondering if the size of the deficit after the election was just as political as before. Here are sum numbers.
7 posted on
01/14/2003 12:07:03 PM PST by
Carry_Okie
(Because there are a lot of people in power who are truly evil.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson