Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yasmine Bleeth: My battle with drugs (or, how my nose almost fell off - WOD Alert!)
Yahoo! News ^ | 1.23.03

Posted on 01/24/2003 8:38:49 PM PST by mhking

Yasmine Bleeth: My battle with drugs
Thursday January 23, 2003

FOR Baywatch beauty Yasmine Bleeth, getting high on drugs brought her so low, it nearly killed her.

Now she's poured out her heart and revealed for the first time her horrific battle with cocaine, her rocky fight to win back her life and the love that is helping her.

Two years ago, the actress' drug habit was so bad, she didn't sleep for days at a time. She looked like death and on Sept. 12, 2001, she nearly drove herself into an early grave after losing control of her car on a Michigan road and careening into a median while high.

She spent a night in jail and, after a plea bargain, was sentenced to two years' probation and 100 hours of community service.

"For three years, people had been telling me that drugs would kill me," says Yasmine, 34, who was in the car with boyfriend Paul Cerrito, whom she married last August. "And this was my proof."

Bleeth says cocaine crept into her world so slowly, so easily, she didn't realize it until she was hooked.

When her three-year contract with Baywatch ended in 1997, she moved from L.A. to San Francisco and started her gig on Nash Bridges, opposite Don Johnson. Her romance with actor Richard Grieco had all but died, and she started drowning her pain with drugs.

"I just wanted to feel good again," she confides. "And I knew an easy way to get that feeling."

At first Yasmine just snorted the stuff socially on weekends with people she knew. Three months later, she made her first call to a dealer.

"It was like ordering Chinese food," she says. "I made one phone call and they delivered it to my front door."

Suddenly, she was in love again - with the white powder. "It was all I could think about," she admits. "When I was high, I didn't think about my problems. I had no pain. I wouldn't sleep for two or three days, sometimes even four or five."

By the end of 1999, her ghastly appearance started scaring her friends and family.

"I'm a fleshy girl, very curvy and round, but I lost my softness," she says. "I looked like an alien. My eyes were bulging out of my face. I was 110 pounds and a size 0. I looked dead."

In fact, she was slowly killing herself.

"I had an infection that had completely eaten out the inside of my nose," she tells Glamour magazine. "Essentially, I had gangrene in my nose."

The doctor put her on antibiotics and told her that another couple of months with this infection and it could have gone to her brain and killed her.

"That scared me," says Yasmine. "Until I started doing drugs again six weeks later."

In no time, the devastating drug cycle began again. Remarkably, she managed to drag herself to the set of the series Titans. But she was in no shape to film. The show's producer, Aaron Spelling, gave her time off to go to rehab at Promises in Malibu, Calif.

"I did drugs right up until I entered the program," says Yasmine. "I even did drugs in the Town Car on the way there."

During her December 2000 treatment, she met someone who made her feel better than the powder: Michigan bar owner Paul Cerrito, 32. After rehab, Yasmine invited Paul to stay with her in L.A.

"I thought that if ever I could handle doing drugs casually, now would be the time," she says. "But once I started doing coke, I lost control, and it took over my life again."

Yasmine was high when she crashed her car in Michigan a year and a half ago and nearly died. But now she sees that crash as a godsend. "I felt like some force had saved our lives," she says.

She knew she desperately needed to quit drugs - and finally, she did. Then this past August, just less than a year after her car crash, she and Paul tied the knot in Santa Barbara and honeymooned in Hawaii.

Yasmine is clean now, but it hasn't been easy. Her husband's love helps her over the rough patches.

"The feeling I have when I'm with Paul is better than how I felt on cocaine," she says.

But she still has to take one day at a time.

"Consciously trying to stay off drugs is now part of my life, and it always will be," she says.

"I've proven to myself that I can't have both drugs and love. Every day, I have to make the choice again. So far, I choose love."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last
To: Senator Pardek; Roscoe
Senator, I had a very similar exchange with Roscoe yesterday. Big government liberals never want to admit they're liberals.

He supports an expansive interpretation of the Commerce and General Welfare Clauses of the Constitution that has enabled New Deal/Great Society liberalism and an out of control Federal government (I can provide a link that backs up this assertion if anyone requests it).

Roscoe- It is not against the law to support liberalism. It's just that it is not consistent with the restoration of our Constitutional Republic.

The good Senator is just asking you to own up to your principles.

101 posted on 01/25/2003 6:31:57 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
This past week in NV, two young, alleged coke heads, knifed two little girls, one to death, over a drug deal that went wrong. Seems they wanted to take "revenge" on the kid's parents. Do drugs cause evil things to happen? How about druggies that kill others while driving? What should happen to such people? And what about their suppliers?
102 posted on 01/25/2003 6:34:15 PM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
The public confessions are the "public service" part of the plea bargin.
103 posted on 01/25/2003 6:38:56 PM PST by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
Facts and libertarians, oil and water.
104 posted on 01/25/2003 6:39:03 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe; Senator Pardek
See this exchange starting with post #310 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/828081/posts?page=310
105 posted on 01/25/2003 6:49:02 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
A remedial reading course might not be that expensive.
A simple yes or no might not be that hard.
106 posted on 01/25/2003 6:49:58 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Liberalism and the WOD, shoe and foot.
107 posted on 01/25/2003 7:02:31 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
For the record, I have nothing against medicinal alcohol.
108 posted on 01/25/2003 7:59:32 PM PST by LurkerNoMore!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
I didn't realize we had an agreement on "choice".

We did...on Yasmeen's choice.

Okay. How can I give a prop for what I agree with you on?

You have a point there.

I'm trying to understand what you're saying.

Thank you. That's all I ask. I will offer the same.

109 posted on 01/25/2003 8:23:39 PM PST by avenir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Hacksaw
Many lives have been ruined by alcohol; shall we ban that, too?
110 posted on 01/27/2003 7:29:36 AM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
Christian FReepers should pray for Yasmine.

I met Yasmine in NYC about the time she was claims she was doing drugs. She was very thin....I didn’t recognize her initially. I remember praying for her salvation at that time. I will not feel sorry for her, but I will continue to pray for her.

111 posted on 01/27/2003 8:07:09 AM PST by Lady Eileen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Lady Eileen
......she was claims

Sorry.

112 posted on 01/27/2003 8:20:33 AM PST by Lady Eileen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
I predict there will be no takers.

And I'll agree that no one will take you up on these goofy ideas.

Anyone who uses these substances places others at unacceptable risk of harm.

You've, once again, jumped in over your head. To have an "unacceptable risk" means that there has to be an "acceptable risk", with quantifying factors for each. Your opinion alone does not qualify, and infact, can be proven wrong. My neighbor having a drink at home poses no risk to me. My neighbor smoking a joint at home poses no risk to me. My neighbor eating a twinkie at home poses no risk to me. (Risk = potential for loss.) You have to add another factor to make risk. (AND drives a car, plays with a gun, experiments with flammable liquids, etc).

Waiting until the jackasses do cause harm merely guarantees that most will get away with never paying for their foolishness. The rest of us just fork over our money in the form of taxes and increased insurance premiums to pay for their "freedom." That is socialism, pure and simple.

Wow, let's not wait until someone actually breaks a law, let's arrest them because they MIGHT!

Also, you paint with too broad a brush, combining occassional users with criminal addicts. That is like combining those who profess a belief in God with jihadists who claim to murder for God.

Then, you propose fighting socialism (government provisions for addicts) with statism, jailing and punishing people for vices. You little extremists, you! You are so cute when demanding government intervention in all our lives.

If you want to blow dope or use cocaine recreationally, you should be required to buy and maintain druggie insurance.

Again, government rule for Kevin. Why not include alcohol? Or calories? or SUV's? Or firearms? Or 5 gallon buckets?

You don't understand diddly about a free market and capitalism. If you could require 'vice insurance', what happens when the premiums get too high? Them we're right back to square one, except Kevin has a new crime for which to jail people, and that is being uninsured.

Kevin, you represent govenment oppression by supporting the continuance of the WoD. When are you going to tire of supporting the evilness of addiction, street crime, and corruption brough on by the WoD?

So there's the deal, all you pro-dope closet socialists.

When will you stop lying about those with whom you disagree? Show where I advocate any drug abuse? The fact is that I've repeated told you that I don't "do" drugs, and the fact is that you've repeated implied or stated that I do.

113 posted on 01/27/2003 8:26:00 AM PST by Eagle Eye (Supporting the WOD means being anti-Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
"But should she go to jail for drinking her liver into rot, snorting coke until her nose rots off, or gambling herself into debt until the Mob takes it out on her thumbs and knees? No. Part of personal freedom is taking responsibility for one's actions."

WOW! Brilliant insight! A paean to freedom! All props to you as you swash buckle through life. You are my hero! You rugged individualist, you!

Your sarcasm suggests that she should be jailed for potentially self-destructive behavior.

Do you support the prohibition of alcohol? Why or why not?

114 posted on 01/27/2003 8:38:10 AM PST by Eagle Eye (Supporting the WOD means being anti-Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
Please, please, please show us where anyone has argued that the taxpayer should be held liable for the actions of drug users. On its face this is a lie and is contrary to libertarian principle. You sir, are a liar.
115 posted on 01/27/2003 8:40:47 AM PST by jayef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Alcohol does not equal cocaine and other hard drugs. This is why you yourself drink but don't mainline heroin. Or am I wrong and you actually do mainline and smoke crack for jollies?

Next foolish question.
116 posted on 01/27/2003 9:17:32 AM PST by dennisw (http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Many lives have been ruined by alcohol; shall we ban that, too?

Last time I checked, you had to be 21 and show a photo ID to purchase it. There are also severe penalties to be faced when the abuse of it causes injury to others. Whether you think so or not, alcohol has an entrenched societal history that no other drug can claim. That is why prohibition never worked.

Remember, old Jesus passed around wine at the Last Supper, not a joint.

117 posted on 01/27/2003 9:25:42 AM PST by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: mhking
"It was like ordering Chinese food," she says.

Well, she certainly got that part right!

118 posted on 01/27/2003 9:25:56 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
How about druggies that kill others while driving? What should happen to such people? And what about their suppliers?

Just wait for it, I suspect some enterprising lawyer will file suit against Anheuser-Busch any day now.

119 posted on 01/27/2003 9:30:37 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Hacksaw
Last time I checked, you had to be 21 and show a photo ID to purchase it. There are also severe penalties to be faced when the abuse of it causes injury to others.

I support all of the above for other drugs, too.

Whether you think so or not, alcohol has an entrenched societal history that no other drug can claim. That is why prohibition never worked.

The current prohibition (aka War On Some Drugs) is not working either.

120 posted on 01/27/2003 9:31:30 AM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson