She also got more visibility on the issue which is good. Anything that broadcasts this stuff as long and hard as posible is GOOD.
She did not hurt her credibility.
The people filing these suits have been treated abysmally and damn straight they need to broadcast the incompetence of the SCOTUS “glinch”.
It would be highly unusual to take a URL offline for longer than it takes to replace the file with a newer version. Not hours, yet it was offline for hours, in fact you would not even need to take it offline while you were editing it, even without explicitly making a copy and editing that. Editors make a temporary copy, and at worst the file would be locked for editing, but not for reading. Hers was not the only case to be offline. Nor was the SC site the only one where pages went missing. There was at least one at state, which also bore on Obama, in this case on the "inappropriate" access of the passport files of Senators McCain, Clinton, and Obama.