“Meg Whitman Supports Amnesty”
http://www.realmegwhitman.com/2010/03/17/meg-whitman-supports-amnesty/
Who posted this?
Why?
Politicians today are scum. Pure unadulterated scum. That might explain Palin's increasing popularity. But that's another topic.
Increasingly, the value of the spoken and written word is exclusively what political opponents say about each other. What they say they hold as principles, promises, goals and core values is meaningless, or we would not have a suspicious Marxist as president today.
Poizner has told us what he intends to do. Whitman just peddles her version of "change we can believe in," while catering to public employees, teacher unions, illegal aliens and the same ol' same ol'.
However, what Poizner 'promises' isn't worth a bucketful of spit, since political promises can't be prosecuted for fraud the way the rest of our real world is structured.
Bottom line?
I have no clue whom to vote for in California. However, I have a crystal clear certainty whom I will NOT vote for : the lifetime politicians without a clue, like 'Moonbeam' Brown. Aparatchiks who cater to the existence of the money fairy. Any candidate who even suggests that working taxpayers are obligated to support the leeches of society; the parasites in all forms, from public employees of all kinds to students who destroy and burn to affirm their "right" to an "education" (sic.)
Any proponent of the fraudulent phrase "social justice," which is only war by other means, legal extortion by elected officials who exempt themselves from the consequences of their 'social justice' laws.
My anger is renewed and the problem made crystal clear by having the following reminder before me in large bold letters:
It's the Law!
Deal with it! Dianne Feinstein, 2010.
And didn’t poizner donate to algore’s recount commission in 2000? What a pair of douche bags!
The best commercial running is the one where she uses the same EXACT words on amnesty as BHO does.
Ping!
