Disinformation attempts by determined, paid trolls on FR need to be quashed, no matter where they come from. And like I kep saying, your so-called “simple question” has been repeatedly answered already, by plenty of posters in this thread.
“Doesn't impress me anymore than it ever has—”
Like I said before, you are not looking for any answers at all.
Your purpose here is to troll Sarah Palin threads with an anti-Palin agenda, while ostensibly appearing to be looking fr “facts”. The facts have been repeatedly suplied to you, but you..you don't want to facts do ya?
“I have no doubts about Palin’s popularity with Republicans, but this isn't an election against Republicans only, it's also going to be against Obama.”
You have already been given Sarah Palin’s head to head polls aginwst 0bamna, where she is running neck and neck with the Kenyan Marxist..and..the poll was even from an anti-Palin, pro-Democratic Party outfit.
“Sorry, but I don't simply take anyone’s answers as “proof”.”
FACT: You don't really want any answers do you?
Your purpose in this thread is to troll and push an anti-Palin agenda isn't it?
“Just because YOU think that listing well-known background factoids and polls which are meaningless this far out are indicators of a candidate's potential for success are evidence, I don't have to”
If solid very pertinent facts, and polls from even the opposition that show Sarah Palin with very solid chances in 2012 are “meaningless”, pray tell us, what is meaningful then?
We are talking about a guy here (YOU), who is yet to present even ONE FACT, to support his idiotic contention that Sarah Palin is not a viable candidate for 212, despite repeated attempts from me for you to come up with ANYTHING. And this same guy is dismissing solid facts an evidence out of hand with nothing to back it up?
Will you excuse me while I laugh..at you?
This makes as much sense as anything else you've posted.
When did I say that?