Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: All
It's perfectly possible for Perry to completely derail at this point - in fact, it's almost likely ........serious questions have been raised WRT whether he has the intellect to be president...........

Perry 's most embarrassing moments.......... struggling to answer a foreign policy question, calling Americans "heartless WRT in-state tuition, and stumbling when driving home a prepared attack on chief adversary, Mitt Romney.

It is true that the nation has elected incoherent Texans to the White House, but Perry alone has come up with THE dumbest non-sequiturs. This one at the FLA venue takes the cake: Perry’s debate answer WRT what he’d do if the White House phone rang at 3 AM......informing him that the Taliban had gotten control of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons.

“Well, obviously, before you ever get to that point, you have to build a relationship in that region. And that’s one of the things that this administration has not done. Just yesterday we found out through Admiral Mullen that Haqqani has been involved with — and that’s the terrorist group directly associated with the Pakistani country — so to have a relationship with India, to make sure that India knows that they are an ally of the United States.” Perry went on to tell a story about how the Obama administration wouldn’t sell upgraded F-16 fighters to India. which n-e-v-e-r happened.

====================================

Perry's candidacy-ending response was when he thumbed his nose at his country and its citizenry, saying those who disagreed with him on in-state tuition are "heartless." The inference was that only Perry was Truly Worthy (b/c only he had sucked up to Mexico).

========================================

Perry was anticipating the triumphal moment when he would be able to nail Romney for being a flip-flopper---and had prepared for it. This was Perry's response: “I think Americans just don’t know sometimes which Mitt Romney they’re dealing with. Is it the Mitt Romney that was on the side of — against the Second Amendment before he was for the Second Amendment? Was it — was before — he was before the social programs from the standpoint of — he was for standing up for Roe versus Wade before he was against first — Roe versus Wade? Him — he was for Race to the Top. He’s for Obamacare and now he’s against it. I mean, we’ll wait until tomorrow and — and — and see which Mitt Romney we’re really talking to tonight.”

==========================================

All in all, Perry has a complete lack of presidential gravitas — he has an odd way of responding to a debater, then cocking his head in an almost mechanical way, posing with a self-satisfied grin (as if he had just paged through his vast holdings he's accumulated in Texas politics).

13 posted on 09/25/2011 4:25:59 AM PDT by Liz (The rule of law must prevail. We canÂ’t govern ourselves by our personal point of view.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Liz

To quote what radio host Jay Severin said about Jon
Huntsman, “He is greatly qualified to be the nominee...Of the Democrat party, that is.”

Not only the incoherence but the stand on tuition for illegals. Liberals who know little or nothing about him will
spout, “oh, he’s hardcore right winger”. They don’t realize stands like this put him in THEIR camp.


19 posted on 09/25/2011 4:54:28 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

I don’t understand how this inarticulate, confused and uneducated man has garnered so much support.


37 posted on 09/25/2011 8:25:39 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson