Posted on 09/14/2012 1:19:49 PM PDT by rustyweiss74
Wise guy. Two demerits!
Cattle Futures.
Not to mention, what state she represents. Mental Recession? Got it.
There are separate transactions for options on the same date, so I don’t think that is the issue.
This looks like an accounting error, and if someone were to look at the underlying documents, she would probably incur a loss instead. If so, she actually paid more taxes than necessary.
The accountant certainly would have egg on their face.
Call “little Timmy” he’ll get to the bottom of it!
The first thing immediately noted is the absence of her party of record; our criminal class National Socialist Democrat Party. Spotted that before I read any of the replies.
She’s a Democrat so it’s okay
Then you didn’t bother to READ.... the line above the Sears SHARES listed as OPTIONS. So you are the one that is wrong....jerk
I absolutely despise her, as a western New Yorker. She has spent her entire term of office (1) screaming about needing more women in politics (I think she means more ultra left women in politics) and (2) gay marriage. I have emailed her, called her office, to explain her obsession with those two issues when the state is going down the toilet and western NY is suffering. No responses. Her staff are idiots and are unaware of her votes or bills up for voting.
She married a rich British banker, came from a well do to family, was groomed by that idiot Chuck Schumer, yet to her, “the cards are stacked against women.” Oh shut up.
I absolutely loath her.
And for a woman under 45, she dresses like a granny.
And yet with her abysmal record, the good liberals of NYC and Long Island will ensure a landslide victory for her.
She gets reeelcted anyway....by 10 points minimum
The shares were about $100 on the day purchased (SHLD common) and dropped to $75 on the day sold.
So, she would have had a large loss that she didn’t take.
Who knows the number of shares. Would be about 240 to 320 shares. Obvious accountant screw up. Nobody proof-reads?
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=SHLD&a=04&b=2&c=2009&d=00&e=21&f=2010&g=d
Probably will be swept under the rug as a technical violation. You’re talking about an under reporting of income of somewhere between $800 and $7,000, depending on how many shares were purchased and when.
If it were anyone other than a Congresscritter, you’d pay the taxes owed, the penalty and go on your way.
I take that back. As pointed out here, unless it’s blended stock, it’s a loss over time. Seems like a simple accounting error.
That really his hair?
Therefore ...
That could also be a straddle or spread of the shares and underlying options. The fact that they were both sold on options expiration day is a big clue.
The tax straddle rules usually involve adjusting the cost basis of the stock so this is probably legit. Once again, sorry challenger, no cigar.
Gnat.
Racists!
/sarc
just admit you were mistaken.... like Obama does because I know you will never admit to being wrong
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.