Democrats Philosophy Makes Dangerous Foreign Policy

President Obama’s foreign policy reflects the same misguided Democrat President foreign policy philosophy which has produced many of the dangers we face in the world today.

The attack and killing of four Americans in Benghazi, Libya remind us of the Iranian Embassy attack in 1979 under Democrat President Jimmy Carter. Decades apart, this similarity should motivate all Americans to consider the flawed foreign policy philosophy of Democrat Presidents. - Democrat Presidents feign strong military leadership by overthrowing regimes which are often working to contain radical Muslim movements within their nation - Democrat Presidents use “human rights” and “democracy” as excuses to establish radical Muslim regimes which allow neither when they are put in power - Democrat Presidents ignore or run from the real threats against America and the world

IS THE DEMOCRAT PARTY “ANTI-WAR” or JUST “ANTI-REPUBLICAN” The Democrat foreign policy is primarily based on “political” considerations, not US national security concerns.

The Democrat Party is notoriously “anti-war”. They follow a standard “anti-war” agenda. If a Republican President deems it necessary to actually use American military force to protect the national security interests of the United States, then their propaganda machines go to work on the American people... - When we have a Republican President the Democrat Party organizes “anti-war” rallies in the streets - when a Democrat is President the anti-war rallies change into anti-Wall Street rallies - When we have a Republican President, liberal news reporters/stations/newspapers back the Democrat Party agenda and run a “daily body-count” – when a Democrat is President the “daily body-count” of any war disappears. - Anti-War demonstrations against military actions by President Clinton or President Obama were and are practically non-existent. The Iraq and Afghan Wars “body count” ceased as soon as President Obama was sworn in.

Democrat presidents’ misguided foreign policy philosophy threatens American security. 1- Political considerations always determine their foreign policy philosophy. They claim to “love freedom of all people and have a desire to spread Democracy” but act based solely on political considerations. From President Clinton’s “missile attack” on Afghanistan to detract from the Monica Lewinsky to President Obama’s disinformation campaign regarding the 9/11 attack in Benghazi, Libya…the politics of remaining in power affects foreign policy decisions. 2- Democrat Presidents do not understand the threat from the radical Muslim separatist movement. There is a segment of the Muslim world which works to set up “totally Muslim countries” controlled by radical religious beliefs. President’s Carter, Clinton, and now President Obama have furthered the extremist Muslim expansionism movement with their foreign policy philosophy. President Carter gave Muslim extremists Iran, President Clinton gave them a portion of Bosnia and Kosovo, and now President Obama has established a radical Muslim Egypt. 3- Democrat Presidents do not understand war or the philosophy of those who are willing to start wars. They attempt to treat “terrorists” who have declared war on America as common criminals. Adolph Hitler and Mussolini were willing to start wars which would engulf the world. Individuals who are willing to kill thousands of innocent people in the name of “world domination” are not common criminals. This ignorance hampers them in the “war on terror” and the terrorists who propagate that war.

The pattern revealed - Democrat Presidents’ foreign policy principles: Democrat Presidents target a “dictator” to overthrow to feign “strong military leadership”. Often, this is someone who has been an ally to the United States…always someone in a small country who can’t possibly give the United States a real military challenge. - President Carter chose the Shaw of Iran, an America ally in the Middle East and replaced him with Islamic extremists. - President Clinton chose Milosevic (Serbs were allies in WWII) and a dictator in Haiti (he was a tough one) while allowing Osama Bin Laden to move to Afghanistan and set up the terrorist training camps resulting in the 9/11/01 attack on America. - President Obama chose to undermine President Mubarak in Egypt (an ally) and Kaddafi in Libya (who gave up his weapons of mass destruction program when we invaded Iraq) and the result is another radical Muslim regime in Egypt and stronger Al-Qaida organization in Libya. Democrats use “promoting democracy and human rights abuses” as excuses to justify their actions but as in Iran, the end result is less democracy and more human rights abuses by the radical Muslim elements they helped place in power.

Democrat Presidents ignore actual threats to American security by regimes which have the ability to actually challenge US military force. - President Carter “supported the overthrow” of the best ally America had in the Middle East and replaced him with Islamic extremists while the threat from USSR would have to wait for President Reagan. - President Clinton “saved” the people of Haiti from an evil dictator and sided with Muslims fighting in Bosnia to set up a separate Muslim state, while tens of thousands of people died in the Ruanda. He refused Osama Bin Laden when offered by Sudan and the result was 9/11/01. - President Obama started the “Arab Spring” against America’s ally in Egypt and “freed” the people in Libya from an evil dictator under the guise of “human rights and democracy” while thousands suffered human rights abuses and died in Syria.

Democrat Presidents refuse to acknowledge the real threat from radical Muslim extremists who have a vision of world domination. They ignore and down-play the threat by treating terrorists as common criminals. Giving terrorist the “rights of US citizens” and placing them in the American justice system produces a grave danger to American lives and our national security. - Democrat Presidents (and the Democrat Party) consistently treat “terrorists” who have declared war on America as “criminals” who need to be “brought to justice”. When Democrats are not in power they use whatever influence they have to force their philosophical belief on America. When they are in power, their philosophy puts further endangers all Americans by insisting that terrorists must be tried in our broken justice system with all the “constitutional rights” of American citizens.

- Under President Clinton’s watch Blind Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman was tried and convicted for the 1993 “World Trade Center bombing” . The fact that he is still alive and in a US prison continues to be a source of inspiration for radical Muslims worldwide. Mohammed Morsi, Egypt’s new, first Islamist president, promised to work for the release of convicted terrorist Omar Abdel-Rahman, the militant Egyptian cleric currently serving a life sentence for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

- President Obama’s “greatest achievement”, that is killing Bin Laden, would not have occurred if he (or Al Gore) had been president because they would not allow “enhanced interrogation techniques – that is water boarding”. CIA director Leon Panetta (now Secretary of Defense) indicated that the information which allowed the US to find Bin Laden came from that technique. This is truly the one time when President Obama should have said, “Bush did it”.

- Putting “terrorists” in prison, even “for life” puts them in the best environment in America to recruit homegrown terrorists. Does it really make sense to put radical Islamic terrorists, foreign or “home-grown” in the prime recruiting situation of American prisons? Murders, rapists, drug pushers, gang members, and other anti-social individuals are already walking half-way down the path of terrorism. Do they really need advanced training in how to destroy American society.

America’s enemies understand the difference between Democrat and Republican foreign policy philosophies, and deal the United States accordingly. American’s real enemies know they may face a few missiles or drone attacks but that Democrat Presidents will never commit military forces. A real military option is off the table, despite what Democrat Presidents may say.

It is vital that Americans also understand the misguided and dangerous foreign policy philosophy of the Democrat Party and Democrat Presidents.

The real story is going to be why Hillary and Obama used US power to overthrow the governments in Libya and Egypt. What is their motivation?Did either Hillary or Obama ever express a great desire to free the people of the Middle East? Hillary and Obama are a couple of Democrat grifters. This whole Benghazi thing stinks of a financial coverup by the Democrats. The only reason Hillary and Obama would mess with Libya and Egypt and Syria is if there’s money involved. Look for the money and you’ll see why these two grifters are involved in the Middle East.

Democrat Presidents ignore actual threats to American security.

See Obama

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.