Skip to comments.The Battle To Takeover The GOP Begins Today
Posted on 11/08/2012 11:34:11 AM PST by Kevmo
click here to read article
“why do you log onto FR, which is a pro-life site? What do you hope to accomplish, trying to separate conservatives from their conservative principles?”
A pro-life site...excuse me...I thought this was an American forum..one that extolled our traditions and freedoms...celebrated our rights as a unique and independent people. Show me where the Founders referred to Abortion clinics and Pro-life demonstrations.
Conservative principles are not as narrow as you define...nor as proprietary as you explain them...I don’t see where this forum is dominated by anyone except patriotic Americans...who respect people’s rights.
You need to take some time and see the bigger picture!
A pro-life site...excuse me...I thought this was
***Yes. From the front page, the founder’s statement:
As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution,
Go cry to the mods and get me zotted. If I have been here continualyy since Aug 2000 you’d think Robinson would have banned me before now.With conservatives like you the conservative movement will go the way of the Federalist party.
Go cry to the mods and get me zotted.
***I would do that but I’m more interested in guiding this horse to water, hoping you’ll drink from the water of simple decency and honorability. I’m hoping you’ll stop this behavior you’ve engaged in.
If I have been here continualyy since Aug 2000 youd think Robinson would have banned me before now. With conservatives like you the conservative movement will go the way of the Federalist party.
***Um, no, the GOP will go the same way as the Whigs when they excised the socons from their party. How many Whigs do you know? Do you suppose the recriminations such as yours preceded the expulsion of socons from their party? Are you that confident in your middling coalition which didn’t even deliver you a victory this round?
A lot of people here really believe ignorant crap. Rubio is eligible. Period.
Better get your heads out of your tailpipes folks, you have become part of the problem.
Conservative Christians voted for Romney in great numbers.
This would destroy the union as the phantom ballots in Cleveland and Miami and Philly would rule the country.
And another liberal troll outs himself.
Abortion isn't about a women's own body: half the genetic material of the individual killed during an abortion, comes from someone other than the woman.
2) Friendship with Israel -- Romney and Netanyahu are personal friends, as Benjamin has an engineering degree from MIT and dealt with Romney when Romney was a consultant.
3) Romney did not want to reduce the US first to 300 nuclear warheads, then none.
4) Romney wanted to confront China economically, not surrender to them militarily.
Nice try, troll-boy.
Also read post #51 this thread...
Romney hates guns and wouldn't need a UN treaty; he'd do it domestically.
He would do nothing to face China economically-his friends make too much money on China.
On domestic policy, he would not do anything different.
The childish "troll-boy" comment makes you look like you're not old enough to have whiskers, nevermind grey (gray) ones.
Don’t they already. Would there be any more so called vote fraud with direct election of the President than we have now.
Why do so many red states have one or two Donk Senators or at best a RINO squish, but true conservatives in the House?
Broad-based vs. local voting.
Nice try, troll boy.
Both Iowa and New Hampshire went Democrat. Until the first primaries are moved, nothing changes.
On ALL points : Romney would not have tried "Fast And Furious" in an abortive attempt to ban guns.
Of course he'd face China economically: he would not try for US economic dominance over them, unfortunately, but he would try for the economic equivalent of detente as opposed to Obama's surrender or Clinton's literal treason in giving them the guidance system for ICBMs through Loral, reassigning responsibility for oversight of the transfer to Commerce instead of Defense.
On Domestic Policy, he would not have pushed for massive tax increases, he would have supported small business, and would not have continued the war on coal or restricting oil recovery and exploration on Federal lands.
And aside from all that, the difference on nukes is both necessary and sufficient to override ALL other factors.
You are lying through your foul teeth.
please read my post 23 on this thread