It’s gonna be Bush against “not Hillary”.
And I don’t think there is much to do about it.
I don’t like it. I don’t support it. But here ain’t nuthin we can do about it.
If it is Bush vs. “not Hillary,” you certainly CAN do something about it. You can vote third party or abstain on POTUS and lessen the legitimacy of whomever is the “winner” of a rigged process. Or you can vote for Jebbie and stick that fork in the electrical outlet yet again. Maybe you get a better result than last time with the fork option. Not likely.
WRONG. We can cast our votes for a limited government "third" (actually, SECOND) party candidate and THEREBY reduce the mandate of whichever leftist collectivist wins, Bush/Romney/Christie/other GOPe nightmare or Hillary/other Dem nightmare. Nixon was elected on a plurality with ZERO mandate, and he ended up resigning; Clinton was elected on a plurality, with ZERO mandate, and even though the MSM loved him, Clinton was steamrolled by the Republican revolution and then he was IMPEACHED. That is a fact.
You can vote TO WEAKEN the victory of the leftist Republican or Democrat who wins. Or you can vote to STRENGTHEN the mandate of that leftist winner. A vote for a leftist collectivist Republican in the general will STRENGTHEN leftism all around; a vote for a limited government conservative will WEAKEN leftism all around, even if it "wins."