Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton: Hobby Lobby ruling a 'slippery slope'
The Hill's Briefing Room ^ | June 30, 2014 | Mario Trujillo and Jesse Byrnes

Posted on 06/30/2014 4:48:42 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Hillary Clinton on Monday condemned the Supreme Court decision that found some family-owned corporations cannot be forced to pay for the birth control coverage of their employees, required by the healthcare law.

"I think that there should be a real outcry against the decision," Clinton said at the Aspen Ideas Festival. "And there will be many more now — look, many more companies will claim religious beliefs and some will be sincere but others maybe not. And we are going to see this one insurable service cut out for many, many women."

The 5-4 ruling in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, applies to so-called closely held companies rather than publicly traded companies.

The owners of Hobby Lobby, a retail crafts chain, had challenged the mandate, saying it required them to cover some forms of contraception such as the morning after pill, which they equated with abortion and opposed on religious grounds.

Clinton, a likely Democratic candidate for president in 2016, said the ruling is a slippery slope, citing portions of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's dissent.

"You know there are companies that may be closely held by employers who don't believe in blood transfusions," she said. "That is a religious belief that certain people hold. So does that mean if you have need for a blood transfusion, your insurance policy does not have to cover it? So this is a really bad slippery slope."

The majority addressed the issue, finding no evidence that the ruling would lead to a flood of religious objections. The majority also said the decision "is concerned solely with the contraceptive mandate."

The decision hinged on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, a law signed by former President Bill Clinton. The law prohibits the government from burdening a person's religious freedom, unless it is to further a compelling government interest and is the least restrictive method available.

"This is certainly a use that no one foresaw and Justice Ginsberg makes that very clear,” Clinton said.

The court assumed providing contraception coverage is a compelling government interest but found there were other, less-restrictive ways to provide coverage. For example, the government could pay for coverage itself, the court found.

"So does this mean that whoever wrote that concurrence is in favor of a single payer system for contraception?” Clinton asked. “I think there are a lot of interesting questions.”

Clinton discussed the issue of abortion, calling it a “hard choice.”

“We’re always going to argue about abortion,” she said. “It’s a hard choice and it’s controversial, and that’s why I’m pro-choice, because I want people to be able to make their own choices.”


TOPICS: Campaign News; Issues; Parties
KEYWORDS: abortion; contraception; hillary; hobbylobby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 06/30/2014 4:48:42 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
and that’s why I’m pro-choice

She's a liar.

Any woman can choose whether or not to take the morning after pill; they are not illegal.

However, dictators like Hillary are anti choice in their jihad to FORCE companies to cover abortion.

2 posted on 06/30/2014 4:54:21 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

OMG, a “slippery slope” towards more individual religious freedom! How will the republic survive this slap in the face of collectivist government control? People like Hill make me sick.


3 posted on 06/30/2014 4:55:29 PM PDT by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

FUHRC and all your spawn too.


4 posted on 06/30/2014 4:56:03 PM PDT by bravo whiskey (we shouldn't fear the government. the government should fear us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Only a lib would think that pre-natal infanticide is “health care”.


5 posted on 06/30/2014 4:56:08 PM PDT by sfwarrior (Never Forget The Fallen Heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The decision hinged on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, a law signed by former President Bill Clinton. The law prohibits the government from burdening a person's religious freedom, unless it is to further a compelling government interest and is the least restrictive method available.

ROFL. It's bizarre -- and downright stupid -- to hear Hillary Clinton complain about a U.S. Supreme Court decision that was based on a Federal statute that her own retarded husband signed into law.

6 posted on 06/30/2014 4:57:41 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("What in the wide, wide world of sports is goin' on here?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Now liberals believe in slippery slopes?


7 posted on 06/30/2014 5:00:12 PM PDT by .45 Long Colt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Clinton: Hobby Lobby ruling a ‘slippery slope’

Ya mean, like “gay rights”?


8 posted on 06/30/2014 5:00:55 PM PDT by kaehurowing (FIGHT BULLYING, UNINSTALL FIREFOX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Guess we’re stuck with the law her husband signed into law then


9 posted on 06/30/2014 5:08:40 PM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Wasn’t it President Reagan who said something to the effect, ‘I find it interesting that the people who favor abortion have been born.’


10 posted on 06/30/2014 5:12:29 PM PDT by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

pro choice means nothing. if it’s’for’people’making their own choice.

apply it to homicide. people can choose to murder or not murder. that’s the pro-choice position.

drunk driving. the pro-choice position is that they want people to be able to choose to drive druk or nmot drive drunk.

pro-choice is idiotic trying to pass itself off as enlightened and shrewd.


11 posted on 06/30/2014 5:12:32 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So poor, poor Hillary is in Aspen. Hanging out with the Swells.


12 posted on 06/30/2014 5:13:12 PM PDT by mfish13 (Elections have Consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Go AWAY, Hillary. You’re BORING.


13 posted on 06/30/2014 5:16:07 PM PDT by Tax-chick (I don't feel obligated to provide you with a non-boring gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

OH! So a leftist is worried about a slippery slope.


14 posted on 06/30/2014 5:22:29 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
But any slippery slope that leads to less government mandates is a good slippery slope.
15 posted on 06/30/2014 5:37:02 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s a dead broke “slippery slope” right Monica? Oops! I mean Hillary.


16 posted on 06/30/2014 5:50:39 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The future must not belong to those who slander bacon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child


ROFL. It’s bizarre — and downright stupid — to hear Hillary Clinton complain about a U.S. Supreme Court decision that was based on a Federal statute that her own retarded husband signed into law. “

Didn’t captain splooge also sign don’t ask don’t tell?


17 posted on 06/30/2014 5:52:57 PM PDT by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
some will be sincere but others maybe not

Complete projection on the part of the beast. Liars condemn others of lying. There is NO evidence that's the case with Hobby Lobby.

What a bitch!

18 posted on 06/30/2014 5:54:06 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtrott

“Slippery Slope” And obama/hillary care is a frikken 1000-foot cliff.


19 posted on 06/30/2014 5:55:57 PM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts 2013 is 1933 REBORN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Shove it, Hillary, you piece of garbage. For once, the Supremes got it right.


20 posted on 06/30/2014 6:00:10 PM PDT by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson