To: Cruz_West_Paul2016
No, I don’t agree.
Been there and done that. Probably need a woman, and not Palin.
3 posted on
11/10/2014 6:09:56 PM PST by
Chickensoup
(Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
To: Chickensoup
I don’t agree with that, either.
I don’t vote for skin color, and I don’t vote for genitalia.
We need a conservative constitutionalist and a constitutionalist conservative.
To: Chickensoup
Why did you feel the need to speak poorly of Sarah Palin...and for crying out loud, dont say you did not.
64 posted on
11/10/2014 6:28:36 PM PST by
Friendofgeorge
(Justice for officer Darren------------ PALIN 2016 OR BUST)
To: Chickensoup
Like Queen much? Sound like”Play the Game.” Why not make it simple and vote for anyone who can first spell ‘Constitution’ without a script?
84 posted on
11/10/2014 6:37:08 PM PST by
SandwicheGuy
(*The butter acts as a lubricant and speeds up the CPU*ou)
To: Chickensoup
Palin has been vetted. Whom are you considering?
88 posted on
11/10/2014 6:38:13 PM PST by
HMS Surprise
(Chris Christie can STILL go straight to hell.)
To: Chickensoup
Disagree. Carson needs to run for Congress and we ABSOLUTELY could use a woman named Palin on the ticket.
To: Chickensoup; All
Probably need a woman.....
The Dems WILL nominate Hillary Clinton or Elizabeth Warren. If the GOP did nominate a woman, it would TOTALLY neuter the Dem strategy of asking America to make History and elect the first woman President of the United States. Let me throw this out there.......
What about Susana Martinez, Republican Governor of New Mexico? Female, Hispanic........ Somebody give me some input here. Could she be the GOP "Dark Horse" of 2016 who rises to the top at the Nominating Convention?
167 posted on
11/11/2014 9:05:01 AM PST by
Din Maker
(I've always been crazy, but, that's the only thing that's kept me from going insane.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson