Posted on 12/15/2014 11:05:20 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Elizabeth Warrens weekend heroics have endeared her even more to the Democratic base, and its time Hillary started getting worried.
Are future historians going to look back on the past weekend as the one in which Elizabeth Warren took over the Democratic Party? She didnt win the fight she led over the weekend to have the provision weakening the Dodd-Frank law stripped out of the spending bill, but she was never going to win that vote. What she did win, though, was the ever-more intense ardor of her growing number of liberal fans. Theyd march with her over hot coals. Theres no other Democrat in the country with that kind of following.
So its hardly impossible that Warren could come to be the leader of the Democratic Party. Hillary Clinton, who hasnt been cutting an inspiring figure across the landscape of late, makes a few more dead broke missteps. Warren decides to run after all. The two go head to head through the primaries, but somehow Warren taps into Democrats emotional nerve-endings in a way Clinton simply cant, and she becomes the nominee. And then...
As I said, thats hardly an insane scenario, and its one Clinton should heed, and heed pretty quickly. The general assumption has been that Warren wont challenge Clinton, and thats probably correct. But Warren is well aware of how adoring and numerous her followers are and how much leverage that gives her in the party, and what she wants is to push the party to embrace her economic views. I doubt she really expects that she can be elected president, and I wonder if she even would really want the gig (shes shown practically no interest in foreign policy, and that is destined to be by far the hardest and most hair-graying part of the job). But if she becomes convinced that challenging Clinton is the bestor onlyway for her to maximize her leverage, then she might just do it.
Surely, after this last week, she cant be blamed if shes feeling a bit more intoxicated. After watching her astounding call to break up Citigroup, her admirers have been rushing forth with pleas and petitions for her to run. Referring to Citis role in the lobbying effort to get that anti Dodd-Frank provision put in the spending bill Congress just passed, Warren said on the Senate floor last Friday: If a financial institution has become so big and so powerful that it can hold the entire country hostage, that alone is reason enough to break them up. Enough is enough. Enough is enough, with Wall Street insiders getting key position after key position, and the kind of cronyism that we have seen in the executive branch. Enough is enough, with Citigroup passing eleventh-hour deregulatory provisions that nobody takes ownership over but everybody will come to regret.
I cant remember the last time a prominent senator issued such a direct challenge to one of Americas leading corporations. That kind of talk went out of style long ago, in favor of the corporate leg-spreading so much more typical of our campaign-cash-obsessed era. Warren doesnt need their money and represents a state where, barring a weird scandal, she can get reelected as long as she wants, so she can do what depressingly few senators canspeak her mind on money issues.
But she does have this problem: The media will always peg her as left, a word that in modern American media usage is clearly a pejorative. And if she just gets stuck there, her influence, however great among the Democratic base, will never grow outside of it. More centrist Democrats will make a few gestures in the Warren direction, but nothing more.
So Warrens great challenge is to counter that dismissal by showing that her ideas do indeed have appeal outside the hard-shell Democratic Party base. They do, potentiallya number of polls have shown that Americans, including many in the center and even some on the right, have negative views of Wall Street and would back tighter regulation. She can speak to goo-goo eyed crowds in Boston and New York and San Francisco and Los Angeles, and while shell wow the already converted and rake in the money, she wont be changing anything. But if she can take her message to Des Moines and Louisville and Columbus and Jacksonville and demonstrate that audiences are receptive there, then shell break out of the box the media wants to assign her. And if she can do that, shell become a figure of un-ignorable influence, and shell start making the likes of Clinton really pay attention.
But Clinton should be paying attention anyway. The feeling I sense right now about Clinton is: not very much real excitement, and just the slightest bit of resentment at her inevitability. She seems a little remote. She comments, sometimes, on issues that arise, but it always seems to take her a little longer than it ought to. She has a Twitter feed, but she tweets about once a week, and its always a total snooze. Why shouldnt shewho needs to find ways to make people forget shes nearly 70use Twitter to comment on the news, and say some interesting and edgy things?
Those come under symbolism. Substantively, Clinton needs to see that what Warren represents is real and, once she starts taking positions, take some that demonstrate that she hears what these exasperated millions are trying to say about inequality and the rigged system. No one expects her to be Elizabeth Warren, but everyone expects Clinton to hear and respect Warren. If she doesnt send convincing signals that she does, then Warren may well feel that she needs to run after all. The choice is Clintons.
CORRECTION:" The MSM have gotten their marching orders,
right from ValJay's lips "!
Let see if the Demorats can get another 'Zero' candidate elected based on the color of their skin, or the hormones that pass through the body,
rather than through leadership , ..or accomplishments .
So instead of one prune faced Marxist cow the Democrats are pinning their hopes on a pair of them. One left a trail of bodies in her wake as probably the worst Secretary of State in the nation’s history. The other infamously fabricated some family connection with the Trail of Tears. If either is the best they can come up with they’re in real trouble.
So the commies have lost faith in their current Messiah, huh. Well whaddaya know? Who would have thought that?
Well, I guess its on to the next Messiah-of-the-upcoming-presidential-election for the delusional left.
These idiots never learn. Fauxcahontas will turn out to be the same as the current Messiah.
I wish that I could divorce myself from their fantasy dreams.
She looks weird, she acts weird, she is very very rich, she has a fake ancestry and Clinton is 50 points higher in the polls then the fake indian.
If she's seen as just a drag on Hillary, she will be described as "very liberal" maybe even as "Left".
But if it appears that she's headed for the nomination, get ready for "Middle-Class Champion", "Proud Grandmother" , and "Commonsense Solutions".
Fauxcohontos is this year’s tingle up the leg for lefty Journos. This is the 2nd pro-Fauxcohontos article Tomasky’s written in as many days.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.