Posted on 03/27/2015 7:38:55 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The liberally-slanted polls over the last 8 or more years have liberals thinking America really does support their agenda, not to mention the vote fraud that kept them in power.
I am loving watching them mince into quicksand with Ted Cruz corralling them all into that eventual sinkhole. Jig’s up, fleabags.
“These are presumably intelligent, educated people these editors. They can fill out tax forms and plan meals and do grocery shopping and keep the oil changed in their cars. And yet they sympathize with the view that Ted Cruz is somehow a radical.
The writer of the source article isnt the problem.”
A liberal is a liberal is a liberal.
Doesn’t really matter what their title or position is.
They are ALL the problem.
An Obama loss in 2008 might have helped the Dems recover (somewhat). Instead, their party had to follow and embrace his truly extremist positions.
Everything with these postmodernists is narrative. There’s no truth, just narrative.
“Hes uncompromising, ideologically inflexible, and doesnt appear to be very interested in appealing to anyone other than ............”.
He describes Obama, Reid, Pelosi, and most Democrats perfectly if you add the word leftist to the end of the sentence.
Well, alrighty then. So there's nothing to worry about.
Exactly. Notice not a peep about Jeb Bush the entire week from these people. Again, another so-called prescription from a liberal on how the GOP can fix itself. In other words, fodder for the establishment.
Go Cruz.
1. can you think of anyone who fits this nicely......
"Hes uncompromising, ideologically inflexible, and doesnt appear to be very interested in appealing to conservatives. His views are perhaps the most radical and extreme in a political party increasingly defined by rising levels of radicalism and extremism."
Your answer IS .........????
Mikey can do that because Nixon HAS a biography. Obama has hidden his.
/johnny
A minimum wage reporter- still OVER PAID.
The Democrat states are desperate for higher taxes because they are spending themselves into bankruptcy. They absolutely fear the prospect of the economically sound states electing a president who would pull the plug on their lifeline to the US Treasury.
Bam Bam
The hilarity continues! Unbelievable!
” Its not because I think he will win or because I agree with anything he stands for.”
Yes, standing for America’s founding principles is repulsive to him.
Fixed it
Please don’t throw me into that briar patch.
I will never understand the continuing appeal of progressivism /liberalism in this country. Especially after six years of Obama. To continue to embrace this morally bankrupt ideology
in the face of all that has happened is just mind-boggling. They just don’t get it and neither do I.
Slamming your thumb with a claw hammer will make you forget your stomach ache too. But, not a recommended strategy.
Why, not only two weeks ago, young Michael A. Cohen wrote an article entitled "Lack of a real Obama scandal means focus turns to Hillary Clintons e-mail".
Apparently, Mr. Cohen's face was buried so deeply between Mr. Obama's @sscheeks in search of the Nectar of the Journalists that he missed the MYRIAD real Obama scandals that he & and his fellow NAMBOLA pals studiously ignored for Barry's entire term of orifice.
Glad to see that Michael has surfaced, and, only slightly drunk on Obamajuice, has returned to "journalism", American-style... LOL! :)
NAMBOLA - the love that dares not speak its name.
motto - "We're not as bad as NAMBLA, as far as YOU know!"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.