Posted on 04/17/2015 6:36:47 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
I have bad news for you. Not a SINGLE candidate running in 2016 will deport majority of illegals. So they are ALL for amnesty. Amnesty is like “either you are for it or against it”. There is no middle ground for law breakers in my book. There is no such thing as little bit pregnant.
So, what that means to me is my vote will have to be based on other issues. I am never a single issue candidate.
Rubio is a fine young man. He ,unfortunately, is an amnesty loving , upchuck Schumer back slapping POC. He has turned beggingly contrite ,all of a sudden. But when you rob a bank, you don’t bring the money back and say “Sorry!!”. Rubio is finished with constitutional conservatives. Sorry Marco. You are out.
Besides, I am sick of his immigrant story, Obama patching things up with Castro, means there isn’t any basis for Cubans priveledge any longer for asylum . Bye the way Marco the rest of us 300 million Americans are come also from immigrants and we don’t expect eveyone to find that unique.
I only want the employers to rule out hiring illegals.
NO JOB THEY GO HOME BECAUSE THEY ARE OUT OF MONEY.
Single Rubio out for traitorous lying and backstabbing. Anyone wanting a conservative candidate would automatically eliminate him for that. Anyone still considering him after knowing he is a lying, backstabbing traitor is naive, delusional, RINO or GOPe/bought and paid for.
As we all know that is the dirty little secret in the GOP, they want illegals for cheap labor. Until we start fining business owners its not going to stop.
It sounds like you’re not voting for any republicans either - not even Cruz is pure enough for you.
Senator Cruz is NOT pure on ilelgals issue.
Read my post above please.
Every one of them will NOT deport MAJORITY of illegals.
And yes, And that includes senator Cruz. Actually Cruz
wants to increase H-1B visa’s to Five times current size.
I like that proposal IF the non-skilled immigrant quota is reduced by double amount.
Yes, there is a reason why Rubio is at bottom of my list.
Based on your statements there isn’t anyone running that’s worth your vote, correct? If not tell me who you would vote for.
FYI - Your version of perfect doesn’t exist. Even Reagan understood that sometimes you have to settle for half a loaf, and keep on working to get more later.
Thank you for asking a very crucial question.
Yes, I follow Ronald Reagan’s prescription.
“Vote for the most conservative who can win”.
In 2016 I will observe which candidate is showing the best results overall in first 6 primaries, which are scheduled as follows:
IA, NH, CO, UT, NV & SC
That will determine for me who is most likely to win in general election in November. The candidate who appeals
to broad categories of voters has the best chance to win.
Then I have a laundry list of issues important to me:
Amnesty to MOST illegals <——sadly all candidates for it.
Abortions on demand, including 7 lb unborn babies.
Spending cuts & deficit reduction.
Balanced budget amendment.
National debt.
Military strength.
Foreign policy.
SCOTUS replacements.
Obamacare (subsidized for 87% sign ups)
Food stamps.
Unemployment checks.
100 Misc welfare programs.
Common core & Dept of Education.
It is OK if my pick is not pure on all above issues.
I will make a judgement based on debates and speeches and
TV interviews who suits my requirements best. That candidate
will get my campaign contribution after SC primary.
I am almost sure someone will emerge as deserving my vote.
If Hillary is the Rat candidate, I really do not want to abstain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.