Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark
LOL!

You really are in the tank for the GOP-E.

You didn't even mention the first candidate to announce.

Doesn't matter, you may not care which candidate the media or GOP-E selects, but I do care, and I have and will continue to volunteer and send money to the candidate I want to vote for.

The good thing to know is that you will vote for whatever (R) actually runs.

So it's up to people like me to make sure that Cruz is the one.

/johnny

39 posted on 05/05/2015 8:31:01 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: JRandomFreeper
LOL!
You really are in the tank for the GOP-E.
You didn't even mention the first candidate to announce.

I took the candidates listed in the opening paragraphs of the article… how does that make me in the tank for the GOP-E?

You didn't even mention the first candidate to announce.

Again, see the above.

Doesn't matter, you may not care which candidate the media or GOP-E selects, but I do care, and I have and will continue to volunteer and send money to the candidate I want to vote for.
The good thing to know is that you will vote for whatever (R) actually runs.

Really?
JRandomFreeper, you should know me better than that — [IIRC] you were one who defended my position that my vote for my former governor (Gary Johnson) was not a vote for Obama as some were claiming (Because it wasn't a vote for Romney, it must have been for Obama!).

So it's up to people like me to make sure that Cruz is the one.

If he wins the primary, I cannot in good conscience vote for him — I believe him to be Constitutionally ineligible* and refuse to violate my Oath to uphold and defend the Constitution in such a manner. (I understand that you and others have a different opinion, and I won't hinder you from exercising your will as a citizen as to do so would essentially assert that your opinions are valid only when they coincide with mine.)


* My reasoning is as follows: He was born in Canada, to a non-citizen father and an American mother. The 14th Amendment cannot be cited to confer citizenship as Canada is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, nor was he born or naturalized in the United States — this means that any reference to federal laws (which are cited to prove his citizenship, which is not in question) must needs be devolve from Art 1, Sec 8, which is the power of Congress to set a uniform rule of naturalization. So, his citizenship must be naturalized. (I suspect the 2008 and 2012 elections were engineered to place people into the presidency which would undermine the Natural-Born Citizen requirement, as that is a piece of nationalism that our open-borders overlords loathe and despise.)
40 posted on 05/05/2015 9:20:49 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson