Posted on 05/31/2015 6:52:17 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Senator Ted Cruz represents, in many ways, the extremes of the current field. He was the first candidate to enter the race. According to 538 he is also more conservative than any other major candidate this cycle as well as every post-Eisenhower Republican nominee. He even makes Ronald Reagan look downright moderate when you start comparing stances. Unlike Dr. Ben Carson there isn’t much of interest in Cruz’s early life. He was born to an American mother and Cuban father in Canada, which can be off-putting for Tea Partiers who spent the last decade arguing about President Obama’s citizenship. Cruz went to Princeton University and became a top-tier debater there. At Harvard Law School he came very close to winning the global debating championships.
He eventually served as an adviser to George W. Bush’s 2000 campaign where he worked on Bush v. Gore. However, he had proven to have an abrasive personality and was passed over for a major job in the administration. Instead he ended up as Solicitor General of Texas where he argued before the Supreme Court nine times.
In 2012 Cruz ran for an open senate seat in Texas, winning the nomination with endorsements from Sarah Palin, Ron Paul, Mark Levin and many other Tea Party-aligned figures and groups. He won election and almost immediately started grating against Republican leadership. Less than three months into his term Foreign Policy deemed him “the most hated man in the Senate.”
He went on to gain more fame and infamy for circumventing party leadership and force a government shutdown in 2013 in order to defund the Affordable Care Act in a gambit that ultimately failed, cost billions and enshrined him as a grassroots hero and establishment villain.
Cruz is outspoken. That’s just the best way to put it. Ontheissues.org, one of the most commonly referenced sites for positions, lists most of his stances as “strongly supports/opposes.” He is unabashedly pro-life, pro-Israel, anti-Iran and anti-gun control. He supports a flat tax that could be worked out “on the back of a postcard” and he wants to abolish the IRS. He does not believe in climate change and, as chairman of the subcommittee overseeing NASA, tried to prohibit the agency from researching Earth science entirely.
Not much of that breaks from the center of the modern GOP in theory. His differences in policy are generally on relatively minor issues or the extent to which he publicly opposes or supports measures. But his main disconnects from the center lie in rhetoric and methodology. The government shutdown is a good example. Almost all major Republicans publicly want to repeal Obamacare, so his opposition to the bill isn’t particularly distinguishing. It was his willingness to risk tremendous political capital to potentially delay some parts of the bill, defying party leadership in the process, that makes him extremely conservative.
Rather than simply being opposed to same sex marriage, Cruz made a series of remarks that implied he opposed gay pride parades and possibly the gay community itself. But Cruz saves some of his most extreme rhetoric for trolling liberals and inciting fear among evangelicals. He’s stated that there is a “liberal fascism” out to get Christians. He frequently talks about the “hard-core left” and the “radical left” and finds no irony whatsoever in accusing them of “anti-science zealotry.”
Cruz also has a penchant for ignoring facts; the relatively nonpartisan PolitiFact has ranked more than two-thirds of his statements "Mostly False" or worse. But that’s not really relevant to him since most people calling their opponents Nazis aren’t appealing to logic. It also more or less defines the electoral strengths and weaknesses of Cruz. He can’t win moderates; he’s way too far to the right for that. His only chance is that he can use his mastery of demagoguery to gain a solid hold on the Tea Party and evangelicals during the debate phases and then take several winner-take-all states before a single establishment Republican gains enough support to start beating him.
After that he would probably be doomed against Hillary Clinton. But, he would be relying upon the Tea Party theory that a Republican candidate could win if they rally the base to vote. He would be relying upon the left having lost enthusiasm for Clinton and staying home while the right comes out in droves to elect the best thing they’ve seen since Barry Goldwater and establishment Republicans still show up to vote against another Clinton. Even then it’s possible that so many liberals fear Cruz that they would vote in droves just to keep him out of the White House.
Regardless, he could still have an impact by forcing more mainstream candidates to either try and compete with Cruz among the Tea Party and shift far, far right in the process or just ignore the Tea Party altogether, potentially destroying the far right’s national clout in the process. It’s all a gamble, but Cruz is no stranger to that.
I cant think of one of his positions that are extreme. and if they are considered extreme by the majority then this country is in a lot of trouble.
When a leftist Communist terrorist-appeaser gives
suggestions to the GOP to “help” conservatives.
==> Psyops because Sen. Cruz is smack over the target.
But Obama, Hillary, Pocahontas, Dick Durban, Elijah Cummings, John Kerry, and their like being obvious socialists - if not actually communists - doesn’t alienate a soul.
This has to be one of the most far-fetched articles I’ve read...
Senator Cruz alienates GOPEs, not the base.
He invigorates the base!
Right, well these days staying in a budget and not bankrupting the USA is considered radical.
The people on the left fail to realize that Romney overwhelmed the president with independents and lost because several million conservatives stayed home. If the Republicans nominate a conservative such as Ted Cruz, and he stays to form, he can attract votes from the entire political spectrum. Despite what we hear from the media, including this skull full of mush college writer, a conservative candidate will attract voters of all stripes if he says what he means and means what he says. People are dying for leadership in this wayward country of ours.
Why should we care what a little brainwashed liberal scribbling for the University of South Carolina school newspaper thinks? He is simply regurgitating what his Socialist Poli Sci professor spouts during every class period. Find this dweeb in ten years and see how he’s doing. Talk is really cheap when you think you know it all.
Is he series???
Communist paranoia.
This makes no case against his positions. It is a case against his cooperation with the Republican leadership. The author may think the leadership is the “base” but I always thought the voters were the base. The voters like Cruz and are mad that the leadership.
Maybe that’s because the GeeOpee’s RINO/Rainbow fithcally convervative {uhh} but progressive “base”, isn’t the GOP’s base.
GRIFFIN HOBSON
Copy Editor
Griffin is a first-year economics student from Fishers, I.N. When not searching articles for grammatical errors, he enjoys politics and cats.
...the relatively nonpartisan PolitiFact...
Got a little chuckle out of this.
Homosexual marriage compared to traditional marriage IS extream.
Looks like a flaming lefty college freshman. And he's going to bat for polygamy. Some of his other recent columns on this page:
I don’t know what circles this guy is running in, but I have heard nothing but praise for the guy.
I have heard independents say this, but everytime I asked if they had heard him speak without the filter of the media, they have said no.
I had a few after going and hearing him speak from start to finish that they were awed by the guys intelligence and speaking ability. They were shocked at how badly twisted their impression was through the MSM.
With his pimples and lack of social skills, he’d better pray there is no polygamy. He’d be on the short end of the stick.
"Relatively nonpartisan PolitiFact" translates to "Democratic Party organ", just like "mostly peaceful protests" means "violent riot."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.