To: 2ndDivisionVet
C’mon. President Walker will be no better than a Bush on immigration and deep down we all know it. Some of us have seen this from the beginning. So we have an "immigration hawk" that isn't, and a "social conservative" who won't stand for anything.
2 posted on
07/02/2015 8:13:53 PM PDT by
Colonel_Flagg
("No social transformation without representation." - Justice Antonin Scalia)
To: Colonel_Flagg
Some of us have seen this from the beginning. So we have an "immigration hawk" that isn't, and a "social conservative" who won't stand for anything.
And we have Donald Trump who refuses to say anything about the Unconstitutional Supreme Court ruling that makes Sodomite Marriage constitutional.
13 posted on
07/02/2015 8:38:15 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Colonel_Flagg
Why do they still make these private comments? Say what you mean and defend it, for heaven's sake.
This is why the puppet-masters like Governors. They can say anything and there's no DC voting record to contradict it.
20 posted on
07/02/2015 9:28:40 PM PDT by
grania
To: Colonel_Flagg
Any candidate who does not have a voting record supporting their rhetoric against the invasion of the US is going to be looked on by the Chamber of Commerce-DC elite-globalist puppetmasters as a candidate they can sneak by us. FWIW, the only two 'pubs who've burned all bridges to standing with the pro-invasion, anti-US sovereignty crowd are Trump and Cruz.
Would that ever be a team to shake things up in the US!
36 posted on
07/04/2015 5:15:22 AM PDT by
grania
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson