Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: PAR
“purist” (a/k/a trolling progressive)

I don't know where you got that definition, but it's not the way the term is used here.

The term 'purist' was originally spat at we Freepers who refused to follow the liberal pied piper known as Mitt Romney, in 2012.

We were actually accused of treason to the country, because we chose to stand by our conservative convictions when most others were being terrified into throwing theirs out the window to support the 'lesser evil'.

278 posted on 07/25/2015 6:36:46 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier

I concluded a few years ago that many of those on FR (certainly not a majority) who espouse “purist” views do so in order to encourage others to not vote at all in elections if the candidate does not fit their idea of perfection. Many here stayed home and didn’t vote for McCain or Romney - one reason we have Obama and the resulting unmitigated disaster. Obviously many of these people are principle conservatives who conscientiously can’t vote for a McCain or Romney, but I think many of them are democratic trolls.


282 posted on 07/25/2015 6:42:50 PM PDT by PAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

To: Windflier
The people who insist on a pro-abort, pro gay marriage, pro obamacare, pro big government, pro tax and spend, pro unlimited welfare candidates, like to use the term "purist" when referring to those who would like a somewhat reliable conservative when they are actually running.

We are not looking for purity, just a modicum of actual conservatism. Someone who will actually move the ball for the conservatives.

285 posted on 07/25/2015 6:44:27 PM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

To: Windflier
The recently converted/evolved Mitt Romney looks like he has evolved back to liberalism now that he is not running. He is firmly in support of Mr. Amnesty Jeb. This is a good example of pre-election conversions.
289 posted on 07/25/2015 6:47:38 PM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

To: Windflier

I would add that in my opinion if Trump is even willing to allow the GOP to believe that he is potentially willing to go third party, then he is unsuitable. Because even allowing anyone to believe that he is willing to do so is tantamount to suggesting that he is willing to increase the probability that the democrats win the election. Make no mistake, if Trump goes third party, the democrats chances of winning go up. There is no excuse for that.


296 posted on 07/25/2015 7:01:20 PM PDT by PAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson