Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coulter: I Can See Trump Winning Presidency ‘More Than I Can See Any Of the Other Ones’
Breitbart Television ^ | July 27, 2015 | Ian Hanchett

Posted on 07/30/2015 8:41:38 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last
To: JohnBrowdie

But now she’s a high priestess in the Church of Trump, so all is forgiven.


61 posted on 07/31/2015 6:32:50 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (("This is a Laztatorship. You don't like it, get a day's rations and get out of this office."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon
Yes. I read her book. She has some good things in there, but toward the end she says that nothing else matters, including abortion , until we secure the border.

Epic, 100% fail.

No, the correct answer is that Coulter is for once ...

Epic, 100% correct.

Unless you were born yesterday, it should have by now sunk in that we are in the last inning, bottom of the ninth. Legalizing 13 or 35 million Illegal Aliens is strike three, three outs, game over. But it's not a game at all. It's what Franklin said about people like you: "A Republic, if you can keep it".

Do you not understand that even in 2004, Bush43 only beat the (D)ummie by 3 million votes? Since then they have already padded the rolls with several million more - before Amnesty. It will not matter who is nominated going forward! Whatever perfect views and credentials you want them to espouse will NOT matter, they will only be token opposition in an un-winnable election.

We are watching in realtime the Romans' suicidal welcoming in the Goths to permanently dilute the state to an unrecognizable, disloyal and unsustainable form. I guarantee there were people back then just as distracted from the glaringly obvious as you yourself appear today. Your Trump Derangement Syndrome is like being on the deck of the listing Titanic and complaining about the tune the orchestra is playing.

62 posted on 07/31/2015 7:21:30 AM PDT by Democratic-Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix

I think this rule was dropped when AC became a two-time Mittbot.


63 posted on 07/31/2015 7:25:23 AM PDT by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

She just isn’t over Romney not running again, is she?


64 posted on 07/31/2015 7:27:39 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democratic-Republican

Yes, I do understand all of the points about immigration you’ve laid out.

But if you agree with Coulter that abortion doesn’t matter until immigration is fixed, it’s just another example of conservatives adopting liberal views in order to support a liberal (Trump)...now, shamefully, even to the point of trying to minimize abortion.

That view is completely incompatible with conservatism. Go ahead and tell it to a single baby as that child is being torn apart and sucked out of the womb, or having an instrument shoved into his/her skull. “Sorry, until the border’s closed, you just don’t rate!”

And you know what you can do with your “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” That term more accurately describes conservatives who are falling all over themselves for a self-described Democrat.


65 posted on 07/31/2015 7:28:46 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (("This is a Laztatorship. You don't like it, get a day's rations and get out of this office."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Oh, Anne.

It’s nice to see that you finally got over your love affair with Chris Christie.


66 posted on 07/31/2015 7:53:02 AM PDT by cookcounty ("I was a Democrat until I learned to count" --Maine Gov. Paul LePage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon
"But if you agree with Coulter that abortion doesn’t matter until immigration is fixed, it’s just another example of conservatives adopting liberal views in order to support a liberal (Trump)...now, shamefully, even to the point of trying to minimize abortion.

That view is completely incompatible with conservatism."

You fail on logic as well.

All the (R) nominees are pro-life, thus all the ones elected President are always pro-life. And what has it got us? What can a perfect Presidential candidate's opinion on abortion ever get us?

You need to come to grips with the reality - no candidates' opinion on Abortion means anything in light of Roe v Wade, and a country more than half full of narcissists and evil, near-Nazi-like stooges. It has as much real bearing on policy and change of heart that anything else might. You might as well worry about what football team they root for or how they wear their hair.

I don't want to call you insane but the classic definition is doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result. Yet here you are obsessing over this "conservative" litmus test, but one that will NEVER EVER get a chance to be utilized even *IF* that candidate could get to the White House in the first place.

Furthermore, there are foot soldiers in the war on the Nazi Abortion cult who are actually doing stuff - successfully as we speak. These folks with the videos, and the dripping releases, who clearly learned from O'Keefe and others, are *really* making progress. They are thinking outside-the-box. You however, are NOT.

You are laboring under the misconception that we elect a tyrant for four years who will singlehandedly make everything alright. However, that belief-system or argument has a fatal flaw. It literally means that whatever wonderful results we get in "our" President can simply be undone by the election of "their" President in the next cycle. It promotes an oscillating nation with a set of values based on majority rule.

"And you know what you can do with your “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” That term more accurately describes conservatives who are falling all over themselves for a self-described Democrat."
The label fits your postings here, but if you truly hate it then I will refrain. However, Reagan actually was a (D)emocrat, of the FDR variety no less, and Trump is far more party agnostic than any other to come before him. But why the obsession with the (D) label? Are you saying that is significant? What about Zell Miller (D) versus Romney (R) or any almost any other (R)epublicrats?
67 posted on 07/31/2015 7:57:00 AM PDT by Democratic-Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: PhiloBedo
Actually it was. You're right.
But...
She said something nice about Trump so I decided to give her the benefit of doubt this one time.
Besides she is kinda cute you'll admit
68 posted on 07/31/2015 8:27:20 AM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: shadeaud
.

The 2016 GOP Candidate Field better get ready for a can of Donald Trump "Whoop Ass" ...

Why ?

The "conventional" MSM wisdom is that Trump entered the race on a whim ... and will simply continue his bombastic style at the first Fox News GOP Presidential Debate next Thursday.


That's a recipie for disaster for the other GOP Candidates.


Consider this.

Trump's new book will be released next Thursday (August 6, 2015) .... which means that Trump made the "presidential run decision" OVER A YEAR AGO ... to get a book written, edited and published in 365 days.

Indeed, Trump probably had to start the book project at least 18 months ago.

Fast forward to the "politically predictable" first GOP Presidential Debates on Fox News.

Trump has had between 12 and 18 months to secretly prepare for this game-chaning debate.

His opponents are all looking for "silver bullet" to nail Trump in the debate, to salvge their own struggling campaigns.



So how does Donald Trump prepare ?

Get 12 months of the BEST POSSIBLE briefings on foreign policy, military readiness, economic status, Common Core, Planned Parenthood, illegal immigration crime stats, ISIL, Israel, Export-Import bank, TPA-TTP ... the works ...

and if-when a John Kasich / Mike Huckabee type tries to nail Trump on a "technical question" ... Trump blasts them with both barrels with facts and statistics of his own ...

just like a "legitimate" U.S. Presidential Candidate is expected to.



Moreover, Trump has (probably) already secretly created a special campaign website (to be announced at the debate) with an easy simple-to-remember name like "AmericanVictory'org" (as an example).

Fifty million (50,000,000) GOP voter internet visits later ... Trump will have spelled-out (with pictures and quick two minute videos) his "detailed" approach to a dozen different national issues.


Trumps' GOP debate opponents have neither the brains, vision or MONEY to do all that ... except perhaps Ted Cruz.


Finally ... "Yeb Bush" is taken down by Trump with the simple question:

How can you call "immigration an act of love" when 7,567 Americans have been vrutally assaulted, raped, and murdered by illegal immigrants over the last XX years ?




Godspeed Ted Cruz and Donald Trump !


.
69 posted on 07/31/2015 8:28:56 AM PDT by Patton@Bastogne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Her predictions are not known for accuracy.

She is a graduate, with honors, from Dick Morris College of Predictology......................

70 posted on 07/31/2015 8:39:06 AM PDT by varon (America for Americans first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Democratic-Republican

That was about the most long-winded strawman I’ve seen.

We weren’t discussing candidates’ positions on abortion; the issue was your agreement with Coulter that abortion doesn’t matter until the border is closed.

You can call me insane, or whatever else you want...I really don’t give a damn. But I will note that the accusation of insanity is leveled at me because I advise upholding conservative principles instead of trashing them...including the sanctity of life.

I also note that a socially conservative, pro-life president is termed a “tyrant” by you.

A glance at your posting history tells me where you’re coming from, though. A longtime Freeper recently posted about signups who are largely silent until election time; they crawl out of the woodwork to advocate for the lesser evil, preaching about the folly of holding to conservative principle, and then slink away after the election-—the loss-—is over with.

You signed up in 2006. Your first post was made in 2014. Then, after that single post, you were quiet until this month, when you suddenly remembered you were a Freeper and started to push Trump.


71 posted on 07/31/2015 9:30:51 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (("This is a Laztatorship. You don't like it, get a day's rations and get out of this office."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon
"That was about the most long-winded strawman I’ve seen.

We weren’t discussing candidates’ positions on abortion; the issue was your agreement with Coulter that abortion doesn’t matter until the border is closed."

~sigh~ I don't know how you could misunderstand the clear comment I wrote, it's only a couple above your reply, not scrolled several pages away.

Anyway, RE: Coulter: Yes, but I took it further, laying out how it doesn't matter ever - from the standpoint of a Presidential Candidate. We don't give the President any power over the Supreme Court. That's civics 101. Furthermore, I stressed that in this election - when we are standing on the precipice of 35 million or more future (D)ummycrat votes it matters even less than zero. Turn your logic circuits on.

"I will note that the accusation of insanity is leveled at me because I advise upholding conservative principles instead of trashing them...including the sanctity of life."

NO! I said doing the same thing over and over is insane. You can make your own decision if your foot fits that well-defined shoe. You ducked what I really said, which is that we ALWAYS have pro-life candidates, and it has never made an iota of difference. You have the gold-standard for pro-death in the white house right now, and previously you had all those wonderful pro-life Presidents. It doesn't matter. I would NEVER tell you not to care, but I am telling you that you are wasting your time. Confront your cognitive dissonance.

"I also note that a socially conservative, pro-life president is termed a “tyrant” by you."

Boy did you "note" wrong. Completely and utterly and absolutely wrong. I said no such thing. Even Stevie Wonder could see what I meant. I said: we do not elect a tyrant that gets to implement his checklist of voter demands of which abortion is but one of an infinite number of things ... because ... if this was the case then there is no logical reason to worry about these issues in the first place as they are only temporary ... because ... the very next election can undo everything yet again. We are playing their very game, and always losing, by perpetuating and re-exploring this myth again and again.

The myth is that every four years with an election the ship of state can lurch 180° on a dime - and that is so far from what the founders intended as to be laughable. We ourselves are feeding this myth by first believing a Presidential victory leads to national salvation, and by dwelling on such issues such as Abortion, something they cannot change even if they want to, and it actually locks these horrible things into the background radiation. The enemies of the Constitution won the battle in the Supreme Court, and they are laughing as we argue over whether our Presidential candidates are pro-life. The President is not our savior.

First of all, candidates are always going to tell you they are pro-life, okay, feel better? Yes? Well that's why they tell you they are. And that's where it always ends. That's where it will always end as long as the enemy has their Supreme Court firewall. It is why I said - perfectly logically - that it makes as much difference worrying about what football team they root for or how they wear their hair. You could resurrect Andrew Jackson into a pro-life body and even he wouldn't tell the Supreme Court to f*ck off again.

"You signed up in 2006. Your first post was made in 2014. Then, after that single post, you were quiet until this month, when you suddenly remembered you were a Freeper and started to push Trump."

What does this even mean? You think you can deduce anything from looking at Freeper's posting history? What if you found something completely different? Would that change the precise issues being argued here? Of course not. Anyway, you couldn't be more wrong in what you believe you learned. I'm everywhere, in places you wouldn't dare set foot, fighting the good fight for my Constitution, for more years than you could possibly believe. Whether that means anything to you is irrelevant to me, to you and to these issues.

72 posted on 07/31/2015 11:00:09 AM PDT by Democratic-Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: jjsheridan5

Bought her new book. I didn’t expect to learn anything new, but so far it’s really good. Her sarcastic wit makes it a little easier to choke down the infuriating facts.


73 posted on 07/31/2015 11:11:48 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: onyx

So what you are saying is that she went to the same prediction school that Dick Morris (our resident toe sucker) did?


74 posted on 07/31/2015 11:18:37 AM PDT by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix

OK....you get a pass.


75 posted on 07/31/2015 12:39:13 PM PDT by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

“Oh, I’m not asking those first two questions, believe me, because they were answered long ago for me. The issue of Trump has nothing to do with Bush or any other RINO. It has to do with Trump himself.”

Exactly!!!

DT is PT Barnum 2015 version.

My problem is not so much the message, its The Messenger!


76 posted on 08/03/2015 5:47:08 AM PDT by Valin (I'm not completely worthless. I can be used as a bad example.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: shadeaud
"The question is, ‘Is it good for the people already living here?’

This is the standard Trump states in his book.

77 posted on 08/03/2015 5:58:04 AM PDT by Amntn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’d like to see a moratorium on all immigration for about 5 years until we get the border secure and figure out exactly what kind of immigration system we either want or need.

Bringing a million immigrants a year into the US is insane.


78 posted on 08/03/2015 6:01:19 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson