To: 2ndDivisionVet
Ah... here it comes.. that word, “sensible.”
What is “sensible” to a Soviet Union-worshipping socialist is quite something else for the public at large.
2 posted on
10/02/2015 10:22:22 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(If you're not enraged...why?)
To: ScottinVA
Isn’t it nice how the media never calls them on it and makes them explain specifically what these ‘sensible’ gun laws would be?
9 posted on
10/02/2015 10:25:30 AM PDT by
VOR78
To: ScottinVA; usconservative; GraceG
It is almost as if all editors require "sensible" be prominently inserted into any trite, predictable, and shopworn story or quote they carry.
How droll to say, Senator Sanders.
21 posted on
10/02/2015 10:28:45 AM PDT by
Blue Jays
(Rock Hard, Ride Free)
To: ScottinVA
Can anyone out there tell me of the LAST time a “sensible, sane, hardworking family man, fully vetted and having a legal license to own a gun, took said gun in hand and shot up a crowded ‘anything’?
It appears that the “mass shooters” of recent history all had backgrounds that just screamed “CAUTION—CAUTION!!”
23 posted on
10/02/2015 10:29:10 AM PDT by
CaptainAmiigaf
(New York Times: "We print the news as it fits our views.")
To: ScottinVA
Wow. I was thinking the exact same thing. “Sensible” is in the eye of the beholder.
42 posted on
10/02/2015 10:35:46 AM PDT by
Roger Kaputnik
(Just because I'm paranoid doesn't prove that they aren't out to get me.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson