[Perchant]

What was the specific law that changed it in 1950? If they can pass legislation that changes how constitutional language is interpreted, then it’s worthless. I’d say it’s unconstitutional legislation if it changes how the Constitution operates.

[patlin]

It really began in 1936, however, it was in the early 1950’s that the law sought to further destroy the family as being “ONE” I the eyes of the law, including nationality. Congress passed legislation that said that a wife does not have to take the national character (citizenship) of her husband, you know, all that feminist crap!

And so we see, from the ratification of the 19th Amendment, there has been a slow but gradual destruction of the family as one cohesive body, in faith, in ethics & in law. And this especially speaks to the usurpation of the 14th Amendment and the “anchor baby” syndrome. US citizenship is derived by consent of the person receiving it. Children do not have the intellect to consent, their parents consent for them and one cannot consent to pass to their children what they themselves do not possess. And thus the reason for the takeover of the education system, the government becoming the parent ... it is a very dangerous world for our children & grandchildren today!!!

And the fact that we have an “anchor baby” being allowed to run for the presidency, being supported by so-called constitutionalists who deny that the nationality of the parents at the birth of the child has anything to do with ones nationality at birth, well, it just proves that this nation is no longer a constitutional one.

[patlin]

specifically, it actually began with “The Cable Act of 1922”, then WOMEN AND U.S. NATURALIZATION LAW REPATRIATION ACT OF 1936, and then the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952