I spoke with one female colleague.
She does not have a TV at home and watches no TV elsewhere.
She reads the NYT but pays no attention to the WSJ.
She is OK with Hillary destroying emails because she says all politicians get away with destroying records (she gave Petreaus as an example but had no counters to observation that Petreaus was a general (not a politician), or to Nixon).
She totally believes HRC has bacterial pneumonia and that it is non-contagious enough for her to be hugging little children.
She claims to have read a FBI transcript of a HRC interview, but did not read where HRC cited medical reasons for her inability to recall email and other records handling related discrepancie.
She had no interest in looking at videos of HRC’s recent problems in public appearance.
She thinks Obama was obviously born in the USA and her extemporaneous comment on anyone who believed otherwise was “duh.”
Her views on any differences of opinion from the MSM version was that it was a conspiracy theory and not worthy of consideration.
In short, she carefully tailored her input to her predetermined beliefs.
I believe that the MSM carefully tailors its output correspondingly so as to be as minimally damaging to HRC’s chances for the presidency, no matter how silly it makes the MSM look to anyone who is following the news with healthy skepticism.
Dumb as a Box of Barbara Boxers. They can’t help it.